Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Apr 29;20(1):147.
doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1321-2.

Transplantation and diabetes (Transdiab): a pilot randomised controlled trial of metformin in impaired glucose tolerance after kidney transplantation

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Transplantation and diabetes (Transdiab): a pilot randomised controlled trial of metformin in impaired glucose tolerance after kidney transplantation

Basil Alnasrallah et al. BMC Nephrol. .

Abstract

Background: Post transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a common and serious complication after renal transplantation with significant morbidity and mortality. Metformin has proven benefits in the general population and might be advantageous in the prevention and management of PTDM.

Methods: Transplantation and Diabetes (Transdiab) is a single-centre, unblinded, pilot randomised controlled trial assessing the feasibility, tolerability and efficacy of metformin after renal transplantation in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Participants had an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in the 4-12 weeks post-transplantation; those with IGT were randomised to standard care or standard care and metformin 500 mg twice daily and followed up for 12 months.

Results: Seventy eight patients had an OGTT over 24 months, 25 of them had IGT, of those, 19 patients were randomised, giving a feasibility of recruitment of 24.4%. Ten patients were randomised to metformin and 9 patients to standard care. Tolerability and efficacy was similar between the 2 groups with no serious adverse events. There was no difference in secondary outcomes relating to the metabolic profile.

Conclusions: The use of metformin post renal transplantation appeared feasible and safe. Larger randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to establish and confirm the efficacy and safety of metformin post renal transplantation.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12614001171606 . Date of registration 7/11/2014.

Keywords: Diabetic kidney disease; Kidney transplantation; Post transplant diabetes mellitus; Randomised control trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval has been obtained through the Northern B Health and Disability Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health in New Zealand. Ethics approval number is 14/ STH/129. Written informed consent has been obtained from all individuals participating in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of Transdiab trial. IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow chart of results of recruitment into Transdiab trial. IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; PTDM, Post transplantation Diabetes Mellitus; DM, Diabetes Mellitus
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
HbA1c levels during follow up in the intervention and control groups. HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; NS is not significant when P-value is > 0.05
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Fasting glucose levels during follow up in the intervention and control groups. NS is not significant when P-value is > 0.05

References

    1. ANZDATA Registry. The 39th annual ANZDATA report. Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and transplant Registry, Adelaide, Australia. 2017. Available at: http://www.anzdata.org.au/v1/report_2016.html. Accessed 13 Apr 2019.
    1. Port FK, Wolfe RA, Mauger EA, et al. Comparison of survival probabilities for dialysis patients vs cadaveric renal transplant recipients. JAMA. 1993;270:1339–1343. doi: 10.1001/jama.1993.03510110079036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonald SP, Russ GR. Survival of recipients of cadaveric kidney transplants compared with those receiving dialysis treatment in Australia and New Zealand, 1991–2001. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17:2212–2219. doi: 10.1093/ndt/17.12.2212. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Laupacis A, Keown P, Pus N, et al. A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation. Kidney Int. 1996;50:235–242. doi: 10.1038/ki.1996.307. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howard K, Salkeld G, White S, et al. The cost-effectiveness of increasing kidney transplantation and home-based dialysis. Nephrology. 2009;14:123–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2008.01073.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms