The effect of dural release on extended laminoplasty for the treatment of multi-level cervical myelopathy
- PMID: 31039764
- PMCID: PMC6492429
- DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2554-8
The effect of dural release on extended laminoplasty for the treatment of multi-level cervical myelopathy
Abstract
Objective: The effects of dural release on extended laminoplasty for the treatment of multi-level cervical myelopathy were explored and discussed.
Method: Patients, who underwent extended laminoplasty combined with dural release for the treatment of multi-level cervical myelopathy (35 cases, group A), were compared with patients who underwent simple extended laminoplasty (38 cases, group B). The JOA score, improvement rate, VAS score, distance of retroposition of the spinal cord, cervical lordosis were compared between the two groups.
Results: Dural laceration occurred to five patients during surgery, three in group A and two in group B; cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred to five patients, three in group A and two in group B. All patients were followed up for 10 to 48 months (mean 20.3 months). JOA scores and VAS scores in the last follow up period were significantly improved in the two groups than preoperative scores (p < 0.05). The improvement rate and JOA scores in group A were significantly higher than group B, while VAS scores in group A were significantly lower than group B (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in cervical lordosis in the two groups in the last follow up (p > 0.05), and the distance of retroposition of the spinal cord in group A was higher than B (p < 0.05). No shut-up of the 'door' of vertebral lamina occurred in the period of follow-up.
Conclusion: Dural release on extended laminoplasty can achieve retroposition of the spinal cord for multi-level cervical myelopathy, which is more effective than simple extended laminoplasty.
Keywords: Dural release; Extended laminoplasty; Multi-level cervical myelopathy.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Luohe Central Hospital of Orthopedics. The patients gave their written informed consent for the study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
