Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan;25(1):67-81.
doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0405-5. Epub 2019 Apr 30.

A review of neuroeconomic gameplay in psychiatric disorders

Affiliations
Review

A review of neuroeconomic gameplay in psychiatric disorders

Siân E Robson et al. Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Abnormalities in social interaction are a common feature of several psychiatric disorders, aligning with the recent move towards using Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) to describe disorders in terms of observable behaviours rather than using specific diagnoses. Neuroeconomic games are an effective measure of social decision-making that can be adapted for use in neuroimaging, allowing investigation of the biological basis for behaviour. This review summarises findings of neuroeconomic gameplay studies in Axis 1 psychiatric disorders and advocates the use of these games as measures of the RDoC Affiliation and Attachment, Reward Responsiveness, Reward Learning and Reward Valuation constructs. Although research on neuroeconomic gameplay is in its infancy, consistencies have been observed across disorders, particularly in terms of impaired integration of social and cognitive information, avoidance of negative social interactions and reduced reward sensitivity, as well as a reduction in activity in brain regions associated with processing and responding to social information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic of the main neuroeconomic games. a Ultimatum Game, b Trust Game, c Prisoner’s Dilemma and d Public Goods Game
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of the search strategy and results

References

    1. National Institute of Mental Health. Behavioral Assessment Methods for RDoC Constructs: A Report by the National Advisory Mental Health Council Workgroup on Tasks and Measures for Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). 2016. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/advisory-boards-and-groups/namhc/reports/...
    1. Brüne Martin, Wischniewski Julia. From DNA to Social Cognition. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2011. Complex Social Cognition and the Appreciation of Social Norms in Psychiatric Disorders: Insights from Evolutionary Game Theory; pp. 215–231.
    1. Billeke P, Boardman S, Doraiswamy PM. Social cognition in major depressive disorder: a new paradigm? Translational Neuroscience. 2013;4:437–47.
    1. Kupferberg A, Bicks L, Hasler G. Social functioning in major depressive disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;69:313–32. - PubMed
    1. Wischniewski J, Windmann S, Juckel G, Brüne M. Rules of social exchange: game theory, individual differences and psychopathology. Neurosci & Biobehav Rev. 2009;33:305–13. - PubMed