Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 8:14:775-780.
doi: 10.2147/COPD.S193827. eCollection 2019.

Safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of virtual pulmonary rehabilitation in the real world

Liam Knox  1 , Michelle Dunning  1 , Carol-Anne Davies  1 , Rebekah Mills-Bennet  1 , Trystan Wyn Sion  1 , Kerrie Phipps  1 , Vicky Stevenson  1 , Claire Hurlin  1 , Keir Lewis  1   2
Affiliations

Safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of virtual pulmonary rehabilitation in the real world

Liam Knox et al. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. .

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of a VIrtual PulmonAry Rehabilitation (VIPAR) program in a real-world setting.

Patients and methods: Twenty-one patients with stable chronic lung disease at a spoke site received (VIPAR) through live video conferencing with a hub where 24 patients were receiving 14 sessions of standard, outpatient, multi-disciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in a hospital. We studied three such consecutive PR programs with 6-10 patients at each site. The hub had a senior physiotherapist, occupational therapist, exercise assistant, and guest lecturer, and the spoke usually had only an exercise instructor and nurse present. Uptake, adverse events (AEs), and early clinical changes were compared within and between groups. Travel distances were estimated using zip codes.

Results: Mean attendance was 11.0 sessions in the hub and 10.5 sessions in the spoke (P=0.65). There was a single (mild) AE (hypoglycemia) in all three hub programs and no AEs in the three spoke programs. Mean COPD Assessment Test scores improved from 25.3 to 21.5 in the hub (P<0.001, 95% CI 2.43-5.17) and from 23.4 to 18.8 (P<0.001, 2.23-7.02) in the spoke group, with no difference between the groups (P=0.51, -3.35-1.70). Mean incremental shuttle walk test scores improved from 142 to 208 m (P<0.001, 75-199) in the hub and from 179 to 316 minutes in the spoke (P<0.001, 39.3-92.4), with a greater improvement in the spoke (P=0.025, 9.31-133). Twenty-one patients saved a total of 8,609.8 miles over the three programs by having the PR in their local spoke, rather than traveling to the usual nearest (hospital) hub.

Conclusion: Video-conferencing, which links a local site to a standard PR program is feasible, safe, and demonstrates at least equivalent short-term clinical gains. Throughput can be increased, with less staffing ratios and significantly less traveling.

Keywords: prudent healthcare; pulmonary rehabilitation; telemedicine; video-linking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box and whisker plot showing change in CAT scores for both groups. Abbreviation: CAT, COPD Assessment Test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box and whisker plot showing change in ISWT scores for both groups. Abbreviation: ISWT, incremental shuttle walk test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Box and whisker plot showing change in HADS-D scores for both groups. Abbreviation: HADS-D, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score-Depression.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Box and whisker plot showing change in HADS-A scores for both groups. Abbreviation: HADS-A, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score-Anxiety.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in over 16s: diagnosis and management. NICE Guideline. 2011:1–60. - PubMed
    1. Corhay JL, Dang DN, Cauwenberge HV, Louis R. Pulmonary rehabilitation and COPD: providing patients a good environment for optimizing therapy. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014;9:27–39. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S52012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCarthy B, Casey D, Devane D, Murphy K, Murphy E, Lacasse M. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(2) doi: 10.1002/14651858/CD003793.pub3. Art. No.: CD003793. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Puhan MA, Spaar A, Frey M, et al. Early versus late pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with acute exacerbations: a randomized trial. Respiration. 2012;83:499–506. doi: 10.1159/000329884. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ries AL, Bauldoff GS, Carlin BW, et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation: joint ACCP/AACVPR evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2007;131(5 Suppl 1):S4–S42. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-2418. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms