Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;9(1):e76-e83.
doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683934. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

Incremental Cost of Prematurity by Week of Gestational Age

Affiliations

Incremental Cost of Prematurity by Week of Gestational Age

Eileen M Walsh et al. AJP Rep. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Objective This study was aimed to compare health care costs and utilization at birth through 1 year, between preterm and term infants, by week of gestation. Methods A cross-sectional study of infants born at ≥ 23 weeks of gestational age (GA) at Kaiser Permanente Northern California facilities between 2000 and 2011, using outcomes data from an internal neonatal registry and cost estimates from an internal cost management database. Adjusted models yielded estimates for cost differences for each GA group. Results Infants born at 25 to 37 weeks incur significantly higher birth hospitalization costs and experience significantly more health care utilization during the initial year of life, increasing progressively for each decreasing week of gestation, when compared with term infants. Among all very preterm infants (≤ 32 weeks), each 1-week decrease in GA is associated with incrementally higher rates of mortality and major morbidities. Conclusion We provide estimates of potential cost savings that could be attributable to interventions that delay or prevent preterm delivery. Cost differences were most extreme at the lower range of gestation (≤ 30 weeks); however, infants born moderately preterm (31-36 weeks) also contribute substantially to the burden, as they represent a higher proportion of total births.

Keywords: health care costs; neonatal intensive care; preterm birth; utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Dr. L.B. reports other from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work.

E.M.W. reports other from GlaxoSmithKline, during the conduct of the study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Inclusion process for birth hospitalization and year 1 follow-up cohorts.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Roberts D, Jorgensen A L. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(04):CD008991. - PubMed
    1. Nijman T A, van Vliet E O, Koullali B, Mol B W, Oudijk M A. Antepartum and intrapartum interventions to prevent preterm birth and its sequelae. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21(02):121–128. - PubMed
    1. Mackenzie R, Walker M, Armson A, Hannah M E. Progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth among women at increased risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(05):1234–1242. - PubMed
    1. Platt M J. Outcomes in preterm infants. Public Health. 2014;128(05):399–403. - PubMed
    1. Manuck T A, Rice M M, Bailit J L et al.Preterm neonatal morbidity and mortality by gestational age: a contemporary cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(01):1030–1.03E16. - PMC - PubMed