Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 29;60(1):E50-E57.
doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.1.1080. eCollection 2019 Mar.

Skin safety and health prevention: an overview of chemicals in cosmetic products

A Panico  1 , F Serio  1 , F Bagordo  1 , T Grassi  1 , A Idolo  1 , M DE Giorgi  1 , M Guido  1   2 , M Congedo  3 , A DE Donno  1   2
Affiliations

Skin safety and health prevention: an overview of chemicals in cosmetic products

A Panico et al. J Prev Med Hyg. .

Abstract

Introduction: Cosmetic products contain a wide range of chemicals to which we are exposed every day. The aim of the study was to determine the presence of potential dangerous substances which can cause adverse health effects by examining product labels.

Materials and methods: A total of 283 products were collected from various shops in Lecce (Italy) and divided into 3 categories: rinse-off, leave-on and make-up. The label of every product was examined and a list including fragrances, preservatives and other chemicals of concern was created.

Results: Fragrances were present in 52.3% of the examined products, mostly limonene (76.9%) and linalool (64.6%) but also citronellol (34.1%), geraniol (31.5%), coumarin (30%) and hexyl cinnamal (29.2%). Preservatives showed a rate of 60% and the most frequently identified were phenoxyethanol (48.7%), sodium benzoate (35.6%), potassium sorbate (22%), methylparaben (15.2%) and MI/MCI (9.9%). The other chemicals of concern were detected in 58% of products; included PEGs (62.3%), acrylate copolymer (34%), petrolatum (17.2%), polysorbates (14,8%), BHT (14.7%), ethylhextyl methoxycinnamate (13.6%), benzophenone-1 (3.7%), benzophenone-3 (4.9%), BHA (1.6%), cocamide DEA and toluene (1.2%).

Conclusions: The use of many of these substances is allowed within certain limits, due to their toxicity at higher concentrations. Other important aspects should be considered as, for instance, the possibility of long-term effects. On the other hand, other substances may induce several acute adverse side-effects, i.e. contact dermatitis and allergic reactions. For these reasons, an enhancement of the criteria used for cosmetics formulation is required since many chemicals used singularly or combined are potentially unsafe.

Keywords: Additive Effect; Cocktail Effect; Cosmetics; Health Prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anveden Berglind I, Meding B, Alderling M. Life-style factors and hand eczema: a population-based study. Contact Dermatitis 2010;63(suppl.1):11-38. 2 doi: 10.1186/1471-5945-13-14.
    1. Sasaya H, Oiso N, Kawara S, Kawada A. Airborne contact dermatitis from cigarettes. Contact Dermatitis 2007;56:173-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01041.x. - PubMed
    1. Aalto-Korte K. Lichen contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 2010;63(suppl.1):11-38. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.91832. - PubMed
    1. De Donno A, Idolo A, Bagordo F. Epidemiology of jellyfish stings reported to summer health centres in the Salento peninsula (Italy). Contact Dermatitis 2009;60:330-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01561.x. - PubMed
    1. Regulation (EC) no. 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products. Official Journal of the European Union.

MeSH terms