Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;47(1):28-34.
doi: 10.3899/jrheum.190008. Epub 2019 May 1.

Placebo Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials

Affiliations

Placebo Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials

Katie Bechman et al. J Rheumatol. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: Understanding the placebo response is critical to interpreting treatment efficacy, particularly for agents with a ceiling to their therapeutic effect, where an increasing placebo response makes it harder to detect potential benefit. The objective of this study is to assess the change in placebo responses over time in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCT) for drug licensing authorization.

Methods: The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register database was searched to identify RCT of biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) in RA. Studies were excluded if patients were conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD)-naive, not receiving background csDMARD therapy, or were biologic experienced. Metaregression model was used to evaluate changes in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, ACR50, and ACR70 treatment response over time.

Results: There were 32 trials in total: anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy (n = 15), tocilizumab (n = 4), abatacept (n = 2), rituximab (n = 2), and Janus kinase inhibitors (n = 9). From 1999 to 2018, there was no significant trend in the age or sex of patients in the placebo arm. Disease duration, swollen joint count, and 28-joint count Disease Activity Score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate at baseline all significantly declined over time. There was a statistically significant increase in placebo ACR50 and ACR70 responses (ACR50 β = 0.41, 95% CI 0.09-0.74, p = 0.01; ACR70 β = 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.31, p = 0.01) that remained significant after controlling for potential confounders.

Conclusion: There has been a rise in the placebo response in RA clinical trials over the last 2 decades. Shifting RA phenotype, changes in trial design, and expectation bias are possible explanations for this phenomenon. This observation has important implications when evaluating newer novel agents against established therapies.

Keywords: AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY RESPONSE; OUTCOME MEASURES; PLACEBO; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; STUDY DESIGN; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interest: None declared by authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adjusted ACR responses in the placebo arm of published RCTs of biologics and JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis between 1999 and 2018; A: ACR20, B. ACR 50, C: ACR70.

References

    1. Fleischmann R, Landewe, Smolen JS. Review of head-to-head study designs in rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;46:279–285. - PubMed
    1. K Arif, FM Kaysee, F Jim, KS Shirin, B WA. Has the rising placebo response impacted antidepressant clinical trial outcome? Data from the US Food and Drug Administration 1987-2013. World Psychiatry. 2017;16:181–192. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khan A, Fahl Mar K, Schilling J, Brown WA. Does the rising placebo response impact antihypertensive clinical trial outcomes? An analysis of data from the Food and Drug Administration 1990-2016. PLOS ONE. 2018;13:e0193043. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walsh B, Seidman SN, Sysko R, Gould M. Placebo response in studies of major depression: Variable, substantial, and growing. JAMA. 2002;287:1840–1847. - PubMed
    1. Rief W, Nestoriuc Y, Weiss S, Welzel E, Barsky AJ, Hofmann SG. Meta-analysis of the placebo response in antidepressant trials. J Affective Disord. 2009;118:1–8. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms