Multicenter investigation on the influence of climate in penile prosthesis infection
- PMID: 31043705
- DOI: 10.1038/s41443-019-0148-5
Multicenter investigation on the influence of climate in penile prosthesis infection
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) infection, time of year, climate, temperature and humidity. This is a retrospective IRB-approved analysis of 211 patients at 25 institutions who underwent salvage procedure or device explant between 2001 and 2016. Patient data were compiled after an extensive review of all aspects of their electronic medical records. Climate data were compiled from monthly norms based on location, as well as specific data regarding temperature, dew point, and humidity from dates of surgery. Rigorous statistical analysis was performed. We found that penile prosthesis infections occurred more commonly in June (n = 24) and less frequently during the winter months (n = 39), with the lowest number occurring in March (n = 11). One-hundred thirty-nine infections occurred at average daily temperatures greater than 55 °F, compared to 72 infections at less than 55 °F. The incidence rate ratio for this trend was 1.93, with a p-value of <0.001. Humidity results were similar, and fungal infections correlate with daily humidity. Infected implants performed in the fall and summer were over 3 and 2.3 times, respectively, more likely to grow Gram-positive bacteria compared to implants performed in spring (p = 0.004; p = 0.039). This was consistent across geographic location, including in the Southern hemisphere. We found trends between climate factors and IPP infection like those seen and proven in other surgical literature. To our knowledge these data represent the first exploration of the relationship between temperature and infection in prosthetic urology.
Comment in
-
Editorial comment: Multicenter investigation on the influence of climate in penile prosthesis infection.Int J Impot Res. 2020 Jul;32(4):469-470. doi: 10.1038/s41443-019-0202-3. Epub 2019 Sep 30. Int J Impot Res. 2020. PMID: 31570824 No abstract available.
-
Editorial Comment on: Multicentre investigation on the influence of climate in penile prosthesis infection.Int J Impot Res. 2020 Jul;32(4):471-472. doi: 10.1038/s41443-019-0209-9. Epub 2019 Oct 25. Int J Impot Res. 2020. PMID: 31654051 No abstract available.
References
-
- Katz DJ, Stember DS, Nelson CJ, Mulhall JP. Perioperative prevention of penile prosthesis infection: practice patterns among surgeons of SMSNA and ISSM. J Sex Med. 2012;9:1705–12. - DOI
-
- Eid JF. No-touch technique. J Sex Med. 2011;8:5–8. - DOI
-
- Sadeghi-Nejad H, Ilbeigi P, Wilson SK, Delk JR, Siegel A, Seftel AD, et al. Multi-institutional outcome study on the efficacy of closed-suction drainage of the scrotum in three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17:535–8. - DOI
-
- Balen A, Gross MS, Phillips EA, Henry GD, Munarriz R. Active polysubstance abuse concurrent with surgery as a possible newly identified infection risk factor in inflatable penile prosthesis placement based on a retrospective analysis of health and socioeconomic factors. J Sex Med. 2016;13:697–701. - DOI
-
- Wilson SK, Delk JR II. Inflatable penile implant infection; predisposing factors and treatment suggestions. J Urol. 1995;153:659–61. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
