Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 1;9(1):11-23.
doi: 10.1159/000495657. eCollection 2019 Jan-Apr.

Cognitive Performance among Cognitively Healthy Adults Aged 30-100 Years

Affiliations

Cognitive Performance among Cognitively Healthy Adults Aged 30-100 Years

Minna Alenius et al. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. .

Abstract

Background/aims: To detect cognitive decline in older adults, measures of verbal fluency and verbal memory are widely used. Less is known about performance in these measures in younger persons or according to education level and gender. We investigated cognitive performance according to age, education and gender among cognitively healthy adults aged 30-100 years.

Methods: The study population comprised 4,174 cognitively healthy persons participating in the nationally representative Finnish Health 2011 survey. Cognitive assessment included verbal fluency, word list memory, word list recall and word list savings from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease neuropsychological battery.

Results: Total variance in the cognitive test performance explained by age, education and gender varied from 12.3 to 31.2%. A decreasing trend in cognitive performance existed in all subtests by advancing age, with differences appearing between 50 and 55 years. Persons with the highest-education level performed best for all measures. For the participants < 55 years, education explained part of the variance, while age and gender did not.

Conclusions: When assessing cognition, age and education should be accounted for in more detail in research and clinical practice. Additionally, the cohort effect and its potential impact on the renewal cycle of future normative values for cognitive tests should be considered.

Keywords: Cognitive abilities screening instrument; Cognitive ageing; Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease; Education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cognitive performance presented by means and 95% confidence intervals (indicated by error bars). Grey lines indicate overall mean of each variable.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cognitive performance with combined groupings presented by means. Grey lines indicate overall mean of each variable.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Prince M, Wimo A, Guerchet M, Ali G, Wu Y, Prina A. World Alzheimer Report 2015: The global impact of dementia. An analysis of prevalence, incidence, costs and trends. 2015
    1. Harada CN, Natelson Love MC, Triebel KL. Normal cognitive aging. Clin Geriatr Med. 2013 Nov;29((4)):737–52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christensen K, Thinggaard M, Oksuzyan A, Steenstrup T, Andersen-Ranberg K, Jeune B, et al. Physical and cognitive functioning of people older than 90 years: a comparison of two Danish cohorts born 10 years apart . Lancet. 2013 Nov;382((9903)):1507–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall CB, Derby C, LeValley A, Katz MJ, Verghese J, Lipton RB. Education delays accelerated decline on a memory test in persons who develop dementia. Neurology. 2007 Oct;69((17)):1657–64. - PubMed
    1. Meng X, D'Arcy C. Education and dementia in the context of the cognitive reserve hypothesis: a systematic review with meta-analyses and qualitative analyses. PLoS One. 2012;7((6)):e38268. - PMC - PubMed