Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 25;7(3):e2127.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002127. eCollection 2019 Mar.

Internet and Social Media as a Source of Information About Plastic Surgery: Comparison Between Public and Private Sector, A 2-center Study

Piotr E Janik  1 , Michał Charytonowicz  2 , Marek Szczyt  2 , Jakub Miszczyk  1
Affiliations

Internet and Social Media as a Source of Information About Plastic Surgery: Comparison Between Public and Private Sector, A 2-center Study

Piotr E Janik et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Background: The popularity of social media among plastic surgeons and patients has increased in the last years. We conducted this study to explore the differences in patients' social media habits between public and private aesthetic plastic surgery practice.

Methods: A 2-cohort study was conducted in aesthetic plastic surgery clinic and public department of plastic and surgery by surveying consecutive first-time patients.

Results: Two hundred patients completed a 18-question survey at a private aesthetic plastic surgery clinic. The questionnaire was also filled by 113 patients at a public plastic surgery department. Facebook was the most popular social media platform in both groups. Word of mouth from other patients and the clinic's website were the most-valued source of information about the surgeon and surgical procedure for patients of both studied groups. Patients from the aesthetic group were mainly women from small towns; they were significantly younger and better educated and used Instagram more frequently than patients from public group. The aesthetic group patients focused significantly more often on the surgeon's credentials and on before and after photographs. They appreciated social media as a source of information for patients significantly more than public group patients who stated that social media were the worst source of information.

Conclusions: Word of mouth from other patients remains the most-valued source of information about plastic surgery. However, proper use of social media and building online image in a professional manner can provide attract more patients to the aesthetic plastic surgery practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
There were significantly more women in aesthetic group than in public group. (87.5% vs 65.49%; P < 0.0001).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Percentage distribution of social media popularity among patients.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Number of social media users worldwide 2010–17 with forecasts to 2021 | Knowledge for policy (beta). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/visualisation/number-social-media-.... Accessed July 4, 2018.
    1. Chang TNJ, Hsieh F, Wang ZT, et al. Social media mediate the education of the global microsurgeons: the experience from International Microsurgery Club. Microsurgery. 2018. - PubMed
    1. Kwon SH, Lee CH, Hsu ATW, et al. Use of social media and an online survey to discuss complex reconstructive surgery: a case of upper lip reconstruction with 402 responses from international microsurgeons. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018;34;413–419. - PubMed
    1. Eberlin KR, Perdikis G, Damitz L, et al. ; ASPS Health Policy Committee. Electronic communication in plastic surgery: guiding principles from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Health Policy Committee. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141:500–505. - PubMed
    1. Dorfman RG, Vaca EE, Mahmood E, et al. Plastic surgery-related hashtag utilization on Instagram: implications for education and marketing. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38:332–338. - PubMed