Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 2:11:2515841419827268.
doi: 10.1177/2515841419827268. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.

Comparison of the clinical estimation of cup-to-disk ratio by direct ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography

Affiliations

Comparison of the clinical estimation of cup-to-disk ratio by direct ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography

Angela Ofeibea Amedo et al. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical estimation of cup-to-disk ratio determined by direct ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography in glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring.

Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study involving a review of 71 optical coherence tomography scans dating from June 2011 to January 2012 at a private imaging lab in Ghana. At the respective referring facilities, only 31 out of the 71 corresponding patient records were successfully reviewed.

Results: Majority (54.84%) of the 31 patient records successfully reviewed were women. The mean age was 44.54 ± 16.15 years. Cup-to-disk ratio was grouped into ⩽0.4, >0.4-0.6, >0.6-0.8, and >0.8-1.0 based on direct ophthalmoscopy values. The overall mean cup-to-disk ratio estimated by the optical coherence tomography and direct ophthalmoscopy were 0.72 ± 0.21 and 0.60 ± 0.26, respectively. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the mean cup-to-disk ratio estimation by direct ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography [right eye (p = 0.0629); left eye (p = 0.0766)]. There was a statistically significant difference between direct ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography cup-to-disk ratio estimation for values ⩽0.4 [right eye (p = 0.0061); left eye (p = 0.0063)] and values >0.4-0.6 [right eye (p = 0.0243); left eye (p = 0.0498)]. There was no statistically significant difference between conventional direct ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography cup-to-disk ratio estimation for cup-to-disk ratio >0.6.

Conclusion: We recommend clinicians document which method they use in evaluating optic nerve head parameters. This is to ensure that subsequent clinical decisions are not influenced by an apparent change in these parameters, especially cup-to-disk ratio as different methods might give different values.

Keywords: cup-to-disk ratio; glaucoma; ophthalmoscopy; optical coherence tomography; suspicious disk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Kanski JJ. Clinical ophthalmology: A systematic approach. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2007, p. 629.
    1. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 262–267. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Courtright P, Lewallen S. Global blindness 2010: what do we know? Expert Rev Ophthalmol 2011; 6: 385–392.
    1. Pavithra G, Manjunath TC, Dharmanna L, et al. Different clinical parameters to diagnose glaucoma disease: a review. Int J Comput Appl 2015; 116: 42–46.
    1. Artes PH, Chauhan BC. Longitudinal changes in the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 2005; 24: 333–354. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources