Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul;34(7):1330-1333.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05014-6. Epub 2019 May 1.

Time to End Physician Sexual Abuse of Patients: Calling the U.S. Medical Community to Action

Affiliations
Review

Time to End Physician Sexual Abuse of Patients: Calling the U.S. Medical Community to Action

Azza AbuDagga et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Despite the strict prohibition against all forms of sexual relations between physicians and their patients, some physicians cross this bright line and abuse their patients sexually. The true extent of sexual abuse of patients by physicians in the U.S. health care system is unknown. An analysis of National Practitioner Data Bank reports of adverse disciplinary actions taken by state medical boards, peer-review sanctions by institutions, and malpractice payments shows that a very small number of physicians have faced "reportable" consequences for this unethical behavior. However, physician self-reported data suggest that the problem occurs at a higher rate. We discuss the factors that can explain why such sexual abuse of patients is a persistent problem in the U.S. health care system. We implore the medical community to begin a candid discussion of this problem and call for an explicit zero-tolerance standard against sexual abuse of patients by physicians. This standard must be coupled with regulatory, institutional, and cultural changes to realize its promise. We propose initial recommendations toward that end.

Keywords: National Practitioner Data Bank; medical board; sexual abuse; sexual misconduct; zero tolerance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

References

    1. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. Sexual misconduct in the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1991;266(19):2741–2745. - PubMed
    1. Government of Ontario. Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 18. (Currency date: November 1, 2018). https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/91r18/v6. Accessed 15 March 2019.
    1. Dubois JM, Walsh HA, Chibnall JT, et al. Sexual violation of patients by physicians: A mixed-methods, exploratory analysis of 101 cases [published online June 19, 2017]. Sex Abuse. 10.1177/1079063217712217. Accessed 15 March 2019. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dehlendorf CE, Wolfe SM. Physicians disciplined for sex-related offenses. JAMA. 1998;279(23):1883–1888. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.23.1883. - DOI - PubMed
    1. AbuDagga A, Wolfe SM, Carome M, Oshel RE. Cross-sectional analysis of the 1039 U.S. physicians reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank for sexual misconduct, 2003–2013. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0147800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147800. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms