Stratifying risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation following balloon cryoablation using the CAAP-AF risk scoring system
- PMID: 31045259
- DOI: 10.1111/pace.13711
Stratifying risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation following balloon cryoablation using the CAAP-AF risk scoring system
Abstract
Objective: To determine if the CAAP-AF tool could be applied to a cohort of patients in the United States undergoing cryoablation or AF utilizing second-generation cryoballoons.
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major source of morbidity and expense, with over 33 million individuals affected worldwide and over 450 000 hospitalizations annually in the United States. Catheter ablation for AF is a class I indication for patients with symptomatic AF. The ability to predict postablation recurrence would have an enormous impact on both patient outcomes and cost to the health care system.
Methods: Our study was an observational, single-center retrospective study to evaluate the utility of the CAAP-AF risk scoring system in predicting recurrence of AF following second-generation balloon cryoablation for AF.
Results: There were a total of 235 patients. From the initial cohort, 30.2% (71) had a recurrence of AF within 1 year of the cryoablation procedure. There was a statistically significant increase in mean age, left atrial diameter, left atrial volume index, CHADS2 , CHADS2 -VASc, and number of antiarrhythmics failed in the group that had recurrence of AF. There was also a statistically significant increase in the CAAP-AF score in patients who had recurrence of AF.
Conclusions: The CAAP-AF score predicted the freedom from AF 1 year following cryoablation for AF. The CAAP-AF score can aid in selecting patients most likely to benefit from cryoablation, which includes patients with a low CAAP-AF score, as they are most likely to remain AF free at 1 year.
Keywords: CAAP-AF; atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; cryoablation; cryoballoon; recurrence.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Comment in
-
Atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes: It's not the tool you use, it's the patient you choose.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Jul;42(7):859-861. doi: 10.1111/pace.13717. Epub 2019 May 13. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019. PMID: 31049973 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical