Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 1;35(9):2401-2406.
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003183.

Effect of Different Types of Loads on the Force-Velocity Relationship Obtained During the Bench Press Throw Exercise

Affiliations

Effect of Different Types of Loads on the Force-Velocity Relationship Obtained During the Bench Press Throw Exercise

Marko Cosic et al. J Strength Cond Res. .

Abstract

Cosic, M, Knezevic, OM, Nedeljkovic, A, Djuric, S, Zivkovic, MZ, and Garcia-Ramos, A. Effect of different types of loads on the force-velocity relationship obtained during the bench press throw exercise. J Strength Cond Res 35(9): 2401-2406, 2021-This study aimed (a) to evaluate the degree of linearity of the force-velocity (F-V) relationship across different types of loads, (b) to compare the magnitude of the F-V relationship parameters (maximum values of force [F0], velocity [V0], and power [Pmax]) between the different types of loads, and (c) to explore the concurrent validity of F0 with traditional measures of maximal strength. The F-V relationships of 15 physically active men (age: 20.9 ± 2.0 years, bench press 1 repetition maximum relative to body mass: 1.20 ± 0.10 kg·kg-1) were determined during the bench press throw exercise using predominantly gravitational (W), inertial (I), and combined (W + I) loads. The bench press maximal isometric force (Fiso) and the 1RM were also assessed. The individual F-V relationships were highly linear regardless of the type of load considered (median r [range] = 0.98 [0.94, 1.00]). The W + I load provided the largest value of F0 (972 ± 45 N; 6.0 and 14.6% higher than W and I, respectively), the I load the largest value of V0 (2.99 ± 0.34 m·s-1; 40.4 and 20.1% higher than W and W + I, respectively), and the W load the lowest value of Pmax (501 ± 46 W; -22.7 and -17.1% lower than I and W + I, respectively). The F0 obtained from the W load presented the highest association with Fiso and 1RM values (r > 0.90). The W + I load and the I load should be recommended to work closer to the F0 and V0 capacities, respectively. However, the W load should be recommended to assess maximal strength capacity through the value of F0.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bobbert MF. Why is the force-velocity relationship in leg press tasks quasi-linear rather than hyperbolic? J Appl Physiol 112: 1975–1983, 2012.
    1. Cuevas-Aburto J, Ulloa-Díaz D, Barboza-González P, Chirosa-Ríos LJ, Garcia-Ramos A. The addition of very light loads into the routine testing of the bench press increases the reliability of the force-velocity relationship. PeerJ 6: e5835, 2018.
    1. Cuk I, Markovic M, Nedeljkovic A, et al. Force-velocity relationship of leg extensors obtained from loaded and unloaded vertical jumps. Eur J Appl Physiol 114: 1703–1714, 2014.
    1. Cuk I, Prebeg G, Sreckovic S, Mirkov DM, Jaric S. Generalization of muscle strength capacities as assessed from different variables, tests, and muscle groups. J Strength Cond Res 31: 305–312, 2017.
    1. Dempster W. The anthropometry of body action. Ann N Y Acad Sci 63: 559–585, 1955.