Effect of Different Types of Loads on the Force-Velocity Relationship Obtained During the Bench Press Throw Exercise
- PMID: 31045686
- DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003183
Effect of Different Types of Loads on the Force-Velocity Relationship Obtained During the Bench Press Throw Exercise
Abstract
Cosic, M, Knezevic, OM, Nedeljkovic, A, Djuric, S, Zivkovic, MZ, and Garcia-Ramos, A. Effect of different types of loads on the force-velocity relationship obtained during the bench press throw exercise. J Strength Cond Res 35(9): 2401-2406, 2021-This study aimed (a) to evaluate the degree of linearity of the force-velocity (F-V) relationship across different types of loads, (b) to compare the magnitude of the F-V relationship parameters (maximum values of force [F0], velocity [V0], and power [Pmax]) between the different types of loads, and (c) to explore the concurrent validity of F0 with traditional measures of maximal strength. The F-V relationships of 15 physically active men (age: 20.9 ± 2.0 years, bench press 1 repetition maximum relative to body mass: 1.20 ± 0.10 kg·kg-1) were determined during the bench press throw exercise using predominantly gravitational (W), inertial (I), and combined (W + I) loads. The bench press maximal isometric force (Fiso) and the 1RM were also assessed. The individual F-V relationships were highly linear regardless of the type of load considered (median r [range] = 0.98 [0.94, 1.00]). The W + I load provided the largest value of F0 (972 ± 45 N; 6.0 and 14.6% higher than W and I, respectively), the I load the largest value of V0 (2.99 ± 0.34 m·s-1; 40.4 and 20.1% higher than W and W + I, respectively), and the W load the lowest value of Pmax (501 ± 46 W; -22.7 and -17.1% lower than I and W + I, respectively). The F0 obtained from the W load presented the highest association with Fiso and 1RM values (r > 0.90). The W + I load and the I load should be recommended to work closer to the F0 and V0 capacities, respectively. However, the W load should be recommended to assess maximal strength capacity through the value of F0.
Copyright © 2021 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
References
-
- Bobbert MF. Why is the force-velocity relationship in leg press tasks quasi-linear rather than hyperbolic? J Appl Physiol 112: 1975–1983, 2012.
-
- Cuevas-Aburto J, Ulloa-Díaz D, Barboza-González P, Chirosa-Ríos LJ, Garcia-Ramos A. The addition of very light loads into the routine testing of the bench press increases the reliability of the force-velocity relationship. PeerJ 6: e5835, 2018.
-
- Cuk I, Markovic M, Nedeljkovic A, et al. Force-velocity relationship of leg extensors obtained from loaded and unloaded vertical jumps. Eur J Appl Physiol 114: 1703–1714, 2014.
-
- Cuk I, Prebeg G, Sreckovic S, Mirkov DM, Jaric S. Generalization of muscle strength capacities as assessed from different variables, tests, and muscle groups. J Strength Cond Res 31: 305–312, 2017.
-
- Dempster W. The anthropometry of body action. Ann N Y Acad Sci 63: 559–585, 1955.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
