Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1986;24(1-2):110-7.
doi: 10.1007/BF02099958.

Evolution of proteins in mammalian cytoplasmic and mitochondrial ribosomes

Comparative Study

Evolution of proteins in mammalian cytoplasmic and mitochondrial ribosomes

S F Pietromonaco et al. J Mol Evol. 1986.

Abstract

The proteins of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial ribosomes from the cow and the rat were analyzed by co-electrophoresis in two dimensional polyacrylamide gels to determine their relative evolutionary rates. In a pairwise comparison of individual ribosomal proteins (r-proteins) from the cow and the rat, over 85% of the cytoplasmic r-proteins have conserved electrophoretic properties in this system, while only 15% of the proteins of mitochondrial ribosomes from these animals fell into this category. These values predict that mammalian mitochondrial r-proteins are evolving about 13 times more rapidly than cytoplasmic r-proteins. Based on actual evolutionary rates for representative cytoplasmic r-proteins, this mitochondrial r-protein evolutionary rate corresponds to an amino acid substitution rate of 40 X 10(-10) per site per year, placing mitochondrial r-proteins in the category of rapidly evolving proteins. The mitochondrial r-proteins are apparently evolving at a rate comparable to that of the mitochondrial rRNA, suggesting that functional constraints act more or less equally on both kinds of molecules in the ribosome. It is significant that mammalian mitochondrial r-proteins are evolving more rapidly than cytoplasmic r-proteins in the same cell, since both sets of r-proteins are encoded by nuclear genes. Such a difference in evolutionary rates implies that the functional constraints operating on ribosomes are somewhat relaxed for mitochondrial ribosomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nature. 1981 Apr 9;290(5806):457-65 - PubMed
    1. Anal Biochem. 1979 Sep 15;98(1):132-5 - PubMed
    1. J Biol Chem. 1984 Jan 10;259(1):224-30 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Evol. 1984-1985;21(4):346-50 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Evol. 1984;20(1):77-85 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances