Study protocol of the X:IT II - a school-based smoking preventive intervention
- PMID: 31046721
- PMCID: PMC6498574
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-6805-2
Study protocol of the X:IT II - a school-based smoking preventive intervention
Abstract
Background: The X:IT intervention, conducted in 2010 to 2013, showed overall smoking preventive effect. However, parts of the intervention appeared less appealing to children from families with lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Therefore, the intervention components were modified and an evaluation of the amended intervention X:IT II is needed to show the effect of this revised intervention and whether children from different social backgrounds benefits equally from the current intervention.
Methods: Main intervention components are smoke free schools, a curricular component, and parental involvement (smoke free agreements and talks about tobacco). Components have been revised from the first version; 1) previously, schools should be smoke free on the school ground and were encouraged to hide smoking so that it wasn't visible to pupils from the school ground. Now they are encouraged to tighten the rules so that no pupils or teachers smoke during the school day, no matter where they are; 2) the specifically developed educational material (Up in Smoke) has been revised so that all materials are online and all texts has a ARI; 3) the parental involvement is now targeted multiple groups of parents, e.g. parents that are smokers, and parents of children that smoke. Language used is simpler and the website for parents presents very specific examples. X:IT is implemented in 46 Danish public schools from fall 2017 until summer 2020. Data is collected through electronic questionnaires to students and coordinators four times (fall 2017, spring/summer 2018, 2019 and 2020). Further, qualitative interviews and observations are conducted.
Discussion: Prevalence of smoking among Danish adolescents is high compared to other Nordic countries and there is social inequality in smoking, leaving individuals from the lowest social backgrounds at higher risk. Although there has been an overall decline in smoking among Danish adolescents over the last decades, a recent levelling of this development indicates an urgent need for smoking prevention in Denmark. The X:IT intervention has the potential to prevent uptake of smoking among adolescents. However, there is a particular need for evaluating the effectiveness of the revised X:IT intervention, X:IT II, with focus on the effect across socioeconomic groups of adolescents.
Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN31292019 , date of registration 24/10/2017. Retrospectively registered.
Keywords: Adolescents; Differential effect; School intervention; Smoking prevention; Socioeconomic groups; Tobacco prevention.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
There is no formal institution for ethical assessment and approval of questionnaire-based population studies in Denmark. The X:IT II study is registered at the Danish Data Protection Agency, ref.: 2015-57-0008. When inviting the schools to participate, principals at the schools received written information about the study. Parents were informed that they could have their child withdrawn from the database, and pupils were informed that completion of questionnaires was optional and that any information they provided would be treated with confidence.
Before conducting observations and interviews all participants will be informed about the aim of the study. This goes for teachers, students and their parents. As most of the students are minors (under the age of 16) parents will be informed about the qualitative data collections from teachers, and informed that they can have their child withdrawn from participation (passive consent). Teachers and students will be assured that participation is voluntary and that results will be treated with confidence. All participants will be asked to provide their written, voluntary and informed consent before participation in the interviews. Students will provide their own written consent. Non-identifiability will be ascertained by assigning each participant with a code in the field notes and interviews. Only persons who are part of the research team will have access to data.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Similar articles
-
Design of a school-based randomized trial to reduce smoking among 13 to 15-year olds, the X:IT study.BMC Public Health. 2014 May 28;14:518. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-518. BMC Public Health. 2014. PMID: 24886206 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The GOOD life: Study protocol for a social norms intervention to reduce alcohol and other drug use among Danish adolescents.BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 3;15:704. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3333-1. BMC Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27488390 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
High impact of implementation on school-based smoking prevention: the X:IT study-a cluster-randomized smoking prevention trial.Implement Sci. 2016 Sep 17;11(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0490-7. Implement Sci. 2016. PMID: 27640187 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Anti-tobacco policy in schools: upcoming preventive strategy or prevention myth? A review of 31 studies.Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23(4):295-301. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050846. Epub 2013 May 28. Tob Control. 2014. PMID: 23716172 Review.
-
Exploring the association between school-based peer networks and smoking according to socioeconomic status and tobacco control context: a systematic review.BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 20;22(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12333-z. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35057769 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Who are the young users of tobacco products? Prevalence and characteristics of Danish adolescents who have either smoked cigarettes, used alternative tobacco products, or used both.Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2021 Dec;38(6):555-572. doi: 10.1177/14550725211027687. Epub 2021 Aug 16. Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2021. PMID: 35309851 Free PMC article.
-
Places to Smoke: Exploring Smoking-Related Practices among Danish Adolescents.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 6;18(2):386. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020386. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33419139 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring smoking cessation behaviors of outpatients in outpatient clinics: Application of the transtheoretical model.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 2;99(27):e20971. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020971. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32629709 Free PMC article.
-
Socioeconomic Differences in Cigarette Smoking and Alternative Tobacco Product Use Among Adolescents in a School-Based Smoking Preventive Intervention: Findings From the Second Year of the X:IT II Study.Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 21;10:825585. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.825585. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35265577 Free PMC article.
-
School Coordinators' Perceptions of Organizational Readiness Is Associated with Implementation Fidelity in a Smoking Prevention Program: Findings from the X:IT II Study.Prev Sci. 2021 Apr;22(3):312-323. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01197-1. Epub 2021 Jan 6. Prev Sci. 2021. PMID: 33404969 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rasmussen M, Pedersen TP, Due P. Skolebørnsundersøgelsen 2014 [health behaviour in school aged children] Copenhagen: National Institute of Public Health; 2015.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical