Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 2;10(1):2033.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09986-1.

Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields

Affiliations

Differences in S/G ratio in natural poplar variants do not predict catalytic depolymerization monomer yields

Eric M Anderson et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

The ratio of syringyl (S) and guaiacyl (G) units in lignin has been regarded as a major factor in determining the maximum monomer yield from lignin depolymerization. This limit arises from the notion that G units are prone to C-C bond formation during lignin biosynthesis, resulting in less ether linkages that generate monomers. This study uses reductive catalytic fractionation (RCF) in flow-through reactors as an analytical tool to depolymerize lignin in poplar with naturally varying S/G ratios, and directly challenges the common conception that the S/G ratio predicts monomer yields. Rather, this work suggests that the plant controls C-O and C-C bond content by regulating monomer transport during lignin biosynthesis. Overall, our results indicate that additional factors beyond the monomeric composition of native lignin are important in developing a fundamental understanding of lignin biosynthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Lignin structure overview. The two primary monomers, sinapyl alcohol and coniferyl alcohol, shown with the different reacting carbons highlighted with the appropriate C–O or C–C bonds that can form. A hypothetical lignin structure is shown with each type of bond as well as the calculated S/G ratio, β-O-4 content, and monomer yield
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Yields and S/G ratios from flow-through and batch RCF reactions for poplar natural variants. a Cumulative monomer yields for all five poplar natural variants (relative to Klason + acid-soluble lignin in the biomass sample). Error bars are 99% confidence intervals for each point generated from a replicate of the experiment on S/G = 1.69 (see Supplementary Fig. 3). b The cumulative S/G ratio calculated from the molar ratio of monomers observed from the RCF reaction. The S/G ratios calculated from monomers recovered are shown in text on the bars. Reaction conditions: 0.96–1.15 g of poplar wood (0.26 g lignin), 0.3 g of 15% Ni/C (50/50 SiO2), 190 °C both beds, 0.5 mL min−1 MeOH, 50 mL min−1 H2 at 60 bar. c Final yield of both monomers and oligomers obtained from a batch reaction. Batch Conditions: 0.96–1.15 g of poplar wood, 0.15 g 15% Ni/C, 50 mL MeOH, 250 °C, 700 RPM, and 30 bar of H2 (STP)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Characterization of the oligomeric fraction of lignin oil produced from flow-through RCF. a Mole balance of S and G aromatic units in the monomeric and oligomeric species in lignin oil. The molar monomer-to-oil ratio, which is a measure of lignin fractionation and depolymerization. b GPC of the lignin oils from different biomass samples at different RCF extraction times
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Structures of observable dimers from flow-through RCF. Each dimer shown was identified in the RCF lignin oil using derivatization followed by GC-MS. Red lines indicate the carbon–carbon bond present between two monolignols, which corresponds to the naming convention. Each variation in functionalization (that was identified in the lignin oil) for each dimer is shown in the list on the right
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Distribution of C–C linked dimers observed from flow-through RCF reactions. a Chromatogram from a representative GC-MS run with a silylated lignin oil (specifically, S/G=1.69 at 1 h on stream). The intensity of the peaks measured in total ion counts. b The relative occurrence of the different coupling partners at different times on stream as determined by relative GC-MS total ion count peak areas. c The relative distribution of linkage types with in each monomers coupling pair as determined by relative GC-MS total ion count peak areas. Note that all dimer analysis was done on the same samples as those shown in Figs. 2 and 3
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Illustration of monomer concentration influence on bond formation during lignification. In the case of fast monomer transport from the cytoplasm to the cell wall, monomers can couple together to form dimers, or add to growing lignin chains. In the case of slow monomer transport, if an S monomer can only add to a growing chain that already contains a β-β bond, it must form a β-O-4 ether bond

References

    1. Ragauskas AJ, et al. The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science. 2006;311:484–489. doi: 10.1126/science.1114736. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ragauskas AJ, et al. Lignin valorization: improving lignin processing in the biorefinery. Science. 2014;344:1246843. doi: 10.1126/science.1246843. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rinaldi R, et al. Paving the way for lignin valorisation: recent advances in bioengineering, biorefining and catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55:8164–8215. doi: 10.1002/anie.201510351. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Himmel ME, et al. Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science. 2007;315:804–807. doi: 10.1126/science.1137016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sun Z, Fridrich Bl, de Santi A, Elangovan S, Barta K. Bright side of lignin depolymerization: toward new platform chemicals. Chem. Rev. 2018;118:614–678. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00588. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types