Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Apr;42(2):62-67.
doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2019.012. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in malignancy

Affiliations
Review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in malignancy

Luke Ardolino et al. Aust Prescr. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Immune checkpoints normally stop the body from mounting an immune response against healthy cells. Some cancers can acquire these checkpoints so that the tumour cells are not recognised by the immune system

Inhibiting the checkpoints therefore enables the tumour cells to be recognised and allows an immune response to be activated against them

Immune checkpoint inhibitors can improve the survival of some patients with advanced malignancies. These include malignant melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial bladder cancer and non-small cell lung cancer

Trials have shown that immune checkpoint inhibitors have significant benefits over conventional therapies so they are increasingly being used in routine clinical practice

However, a significant proportion of patients will not respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors and retain a poor prognosis. The optimal use of these drugs requires further study

Immune-related adverse events commonly include pneumonitis, hepatitis, nephritis, colitis and endocrinopathies. However, nearly any organ system can be affected. These toxicities present clinicians with a new challenge of recognising them early and acting promptly

Keywords: avelumab; bladder cancer; durvalumab; ipilimumab; melanoma; nivolumab; non-small cell lung cancer; pembrolizumab.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none declared

Figures

Fig
Fig
Immune checkpoints

References

    1. Galanina N, Kline J, Bishop MR. Emerging role of checkpoint blockade therapy in lymphoma. Ther Adv Hematol 2017;8:81-90. 10.1177/2040620716673787 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seidel JA, Otsuka A, Kabashima K. Anti-PD-1 and anti- CTLA-4 therapies in cancer: mechanisms of action, efficacy, and limitations. Front Oncol 2018;8:86. 10.3389/fonc.2018.00086 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD. Immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med 2018;378:158-68. 10.1056/NEJMra1703481 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Camacho LH. CTLA-4 blockade with ipilimumab: biology, safety, efficacy, and future considerations. Cancer Med 2015;4:661-72. 10.1002/cam4.371 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alsaab HO, Sau S, Alzhrani R, Tatiparti K, Bhise K, Kashaw SK, et al. PD-1 and PD-L1 checkpoint signaling inhibition for cancer immunotherapy: mechanism, combinations, and clinical outcome. Front Pharmacol 2017;8:561. 10.3389/fphar.2017.00561 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources