Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987 Apr;84(7):1974-7.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.7.1974.

Evolution of accelerated senescence in laboratory populations of Drosophila

Evolution of accelerated senescence in laboratory populations of Drosophila

L D Mueller. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr.

Abstract

Ecological theories of life history evolution predict that natural selection should favor semelparous life histories in environments where juvenile survival is high relative to adult survival and rates of population growth are high. That is, organisms should complete their entire reproductive effort in a short period of time following maturation. Direct empirical verification of this idea has been lacking. Six independent populations of Drosophila melanogaster were maintained in two different environments, called r and K, for more than 120 generations. In the r environment population size was small, larval survival and rates of population growth were high, and reproduction was limited to a few days after eclosion. In the K environment population size was large and larval survival low, but adults were allowed to reproduce indefinitely. The fecundity of females of different sizes from each environment was measured daily for 4 weeks. No differences in fecundity were seen during the first week of adult life for females from the two environments. By the fourth week, however, the fecundity of large females from the r environment was 47-83% less than that of females from the K environment. The accelerated senescence exhibited by females from the r environment appears to be due to the accumulation of deleterious alleles whose effects are expressed late in life, which is consistent with the mutation accumulation hypothesis for the evolution of senescence.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Behav Genet. 1985 May;15(3):297-303 - PubMed
    1. Q Rev Biol. 1954 Jun;29(2):103-37 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Feb;78(2):1303-5 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1968 Oct 19;220(5164):281-2 - PubMed
    1. Genetics. 1981 Jan;97(1):173-86 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources