Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1978 Nov;305(2):159-66.
doi: 10.1007/BF00508287.

The action of caffeine in promoting ultrastructural damage in frog skeletal muscle fibres. Evidence for the involvement of the calcium-induced release of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum

The action of caffeine in promoting ultrastructural damage in frog skeletal muscle fibres. Evidence for the involvement of the calcium-induced release of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum

C J Duncan et al. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1978 Nov.

Abstract

1. Caffeine at concentrations above 5 mM was shown to cause rapidly extensive ultrastructural damage to the myofibrils of frog skeletal muscle. 2. The effect was promoted at lower temperatures, whereas the myofibrils were protected by prior exposure to procaine. 3. It is argued that caffeine causes a Ca2+-induced release of Ca2+ (the CROC) from the S.R. and that the consequent rise in [Ca2+]i promotes the ultrastructural damage observed. 4. Myofibril digradation is also produced by treatment of the muscle with the divalent cation ionophore A23187; this effect is not protected by either procaine or Dantrolene sodium. 5. It is suggested that A23187 causes the release of Ca2+ from the S.R. by a mechanism that differs from both excitation and the CROC; the resultant rise in [Ca2+]i again causes myofibril degradation. 6. The ways in which a marked rise in [Ca2+]i could cause muscle damage and the possible relevance of these findings to the sequence of events in the development of myopathies of human skeletal muscle are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Biol Chem. 1960 Mar;235:665-8 - PubMed
    1. J Gen Physiol. 1963 Sep;47:151-72 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1977 Feb;265(2):565-85 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):21-33 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1970 Jan 2;167(3914):58-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources