Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;109(1):54-66.
doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01484-0. Epub 2019 May 3.

Right atrial-right ventricular coupling in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Maximilian von Roeder  1 , Johannes Tammo Kowallick  2   3 , Karl-Philipp Rommel  1 , Stephan Blazek  1 , Christian Besler  1 , Karl Fengler  1 , Joachim Lotz  2   3 , Gerd Hasenfuß  4   3 , Christian Lücke  5 , Matthias Gutberlet  5 , Holger Thiele  1 , Andreas Schuster  4   3   6 , Philipp Lurz  7
Affiliations

Right atrial-right ventricular coupling in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Maximilian von Roeder et al. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Right ventricular (RV) function is prognostically relevant in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) but data on profound assessment of RV and right atrial (RA) interaction in HFpEF are lacking. The current study characterizes RV and RA interaction using invasive pressure-volume-loop analysis and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) data.

Methods and results: We performed CMR and myocardial feature-tracking in 24 HFpEF patients and 12 patients without HFpEF. Invasive pressure-volume-loops were obtained to evaluate systolic and diastolic RV properties. RV early filling was determined from CMR RV volume-time curves. RV systolic function was slightly increased in HFpEF (RV EF 68 ± 8 vs. 60 ± 9%, p = 0.01), while no differences in RV stroke volume were found (45 ± 7 vs 42 ± 9 ml/m2, p = 0.32). RV early filling was decreased in HFpEF (21 ± 11 vs. 40 ± 11% of RV filling volume, p < 0.01) and RV early filling was the strongest predictor for VO2max even after inclusion of invasively derived RV stiffness and relaxation constant (Beta 0.63, p < 0.01). RA conduit-function was lower in HFpEF (RA conduit-strain - 11 ± 5 vs. - 16 ± 4%, p < 0.01) while RA booster-pump-function was increased (RA active-strain - 18 ± 6 vs. - 12 ± 6%, p = 0.01) as a compensation. RV filling was associated with RA conduit-function (r = - 0.55, p < 0.01) but not with invasively derived RV relaxation constant.

Conclusion: In compensated HFpEF patients RV early filling was impaired and compensated by increased RA booster pump function, while RV systolic function was preserved. Impaired RV diastology and RA-RV interaction were linked to impaired exercise tolerance and RA-RV-coupling seems to be independent of RV relaxation, suggestive of an independent pathophysiological contribution of RA dysfunction in HFpEF.

Clinical-trial-registration: NCT02459626 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Keywords: Feature tracking; Heart failure; Magnetic resonance imaging; Preserved ejection fraction; Pressure–volume-loops; Right atrium; Right heart.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;10(10 Pt B):1211-1221 - PubMed
    1. PLoS One. 2018 Mar 14;13(3):e0193746 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 2018 Jan 23;137(4):364-375 - PubMed
    1. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Nov;8(11):e003521; discussion e003521 - PubMed
    1. Int J Cardiol. 2014 Nov 15;177(1):276-80 - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources