Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2019 Dec;100(12):2399-2402.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 May 2.

Determinants of Return to Work After Multicomponent Cardiac Rehabilitation

Affiliations
Observational Study

Determinants of Return to Work After Multicomponent Cardiac Rehabilitation

Annett Salzwedel et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To explore predictors of return to work in patients after acute coronary syndrome and coronary artery bypass grafting, taking into account cognitive performance, depression, physical capacity, and self-assessment of the occupational prognosis.

Design: Observational, prospective, bicentric.

Setting: Postacute 3-week inpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR).

Participants: Patients (N=401) <65 years of age (mean 54.5±6.3y), 80% men.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Status of return to work (RTW) 6 months after discharge from CR.

Results: The regression model for RTW showed negative associations for depression (odds ratio 0.52 per SD, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.76, P=.001), age (odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.52-1.00, P=.047), and in particular for a negative subjective occupational prognosis (expected incapacity for work odds ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.59, P=.004; unemployment odds ratio 0.08, 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.72, P=.024; retirement odds ratio 0.07, 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.067, P=.021). Positive predictors were employment before the cardiac event (odds ratio 9.66, 95% confidence interval 3.10-30.12, P<.001), capacity to work (fit vs unfit) at discharge from CR (odds ratio 3.15, 95% confidence interval 1.35-7.35, P=.008), and maximum exercise capacity (odds ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.11, P=.022). Cognitive performance had no effect.

Conclusions: The patient's perception and expectation regarding the occupational prognosis play a crucial role in predicting return to work 6 months after an acute cardiac event and CR. These findings highlight the importance of the multimodal approach, in particular psychosocial components, of CR.

Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Cardiac rehabilitation; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Motivation; Rehabilitation; Return to work.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources