Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 4;11(5):797.
doi: 10.3390/polym11050797.

Preparation Methods of Polypropylene/Nano-Silica/Styrene-Ethylene-Butylene-Styrene Composite and Its Effect on Electrical Properties

Affiliations

Preparation Methods of Polypropylene/Nano-Silica/Styrene-Ethylene-Butylene-Styrene Composite and Its Effect on Electrical Properties

Mingze Gao et al. Polymers (Basel). .

Abstract

Compared with traditional insulation materials, such as cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE), polypropylene (PP) is famous for its better recyclable and thermal properties, as well as its good electrical performance. However, the problem of poor impact strength has restricted the application of pure PP in high-voltage, direct current (HVDC) cables. In this paper, styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene block copolymer (SEBS) was used as a toughening filler, and nano-SiO2 was expected to improve the electric properties of the nano-composite. By controlling the masterbatch system, the dispersion characteristics of nano-SiO2 in the ternary composite system were changed. When PP/SiO2 was used as the masterbatch and then blended with SEBS, nano-SiO2 tended to disperse in the PP phase, and the number of nano-particles in the SEBS phase was lower. When PP/SEBS was used as the masterbatch, nano-SiO2 was distributed in both the PP phase and the SEBS phase. When SEBS/SiO2 was used as the masterbatch, nano-SiO2 tended to be dispersed in the SEBS phase. The different dispersion characteristics of nano-SiO2 changed the crystallization and mechanical properties of the ternary composite system and produced different electrical performance improvement effects. The results of our experiment revealed that the space charge suppression capability was positively correlated with the direct current (DC) breakdown strength improvement effect. Compared with the DC performance of 500 kV commercial XLPE materials, the self-made PP-based ternary composite system has better space charge suppression effects and higher DC breakdown strength. When nano-SiO2 was more dispersed in the PP phase, the space charge improvement effect was best. When the nano-SiO2 particles were more dispersed in the SEBS phase, the expected electrical property improvement was not obtained. Scanning electron microscopy showed that the nano-SiO2 particles in the SEBS phase were more dispersed at the interface than in the SEBS matrix, indicating that the nano-particles were poorly dispersed, which may be a reason why the electrical properties of the composite system were not significantly improved.

Keywords: DC breakdown; SEBS; nano-SiO2; polypropylene; space charge.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SEM picture of (a) PP, (b) PP, (c) PP/SEBS, (d) PP/SEBS, (e) PP/SiO2/SEBS, (f) PP/SiO2/SEBS, (g) PP/SEBS/SiO2, (h) PP/SEBS/SiO2, (i) SEBS/SiO2/PP and (j) SEBS/SiO2/PP with different magnification.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Heating and cooling curves of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) for PP and its composite. (a) crystallization process; (b) melting process.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) pattern of PP and its composites. (a) Storage modulus (E’); (b) loss factor (tan δ).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Space charge distribution under 40 kV/mm. (a) XLPE; (b) PP; (c) PP/SEBS; (d) PP/SiO2/SEBS; (e) PP/SEBS/SiO2; and (f) SEBS/SiO2/PP.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Space charge distribution under short circuit. (a) XLPE; (b) PP; (c) PP/SEBS; (d) PP/SiO2/SEBS; (e) PP/SEBS/SiO2; and (f) SEBS/SiO2/PP.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The thermally stimulated depolarization current (TSDC) pattern of XLPE, PP, and the PP composites.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Weibull distribution of breakdown strength for PP and its composites. (a) Room temperature; (b) 90 °C; (c) 120 °C; (d) breakdown strength of materials at different temperatures.

References

    1. Montanari G.C., Seri P., Lei X., Ye H., Zhuang Q., Morshuis P., Stevens G., Vaughan A. Next generation polymeric high voltage direct current cables—A quantum leap needed? IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 2018;34:24–31. doi: 10.1109/MEI.2018.8300441. - DOI
    1. Hanley T.L., Burford R.P., Fleming R.J., Barber K.W. A general review of polymeric insulation for use in HVDC cables. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 2003;19:13–24. doi: 10.1109/MEI.2003.1178104. - DOI
    1. Wang S., Chen P., Li H. Improved DC performance of crosslinked polyethylene insulation depending on a higher purity. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2017;24:1809–1817. doi: 10.1109/TDEI.2017.006165. - DOI
    1. Maekawa Y., Watanabe K., Maruyama S. Research and Development of DC +/− 500 kV Eexteruded Cables. CIGRÉ Session. 2002;2002:21–203.
    1. He J., Chen G. Insulation materials for HVDC polymeric cables. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2017;24:1307. doi: 10.1109/TDEI.2017.006721. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources