Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;76(2):228-237.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.018. Epub 2019 May 4.

Regional Variations in Quality of Survival Among Men with Prostate Cancer Across the United Kingdom

Affiliations
Free article

Regional Variations in Quality of Survival Among Men with Prostate Cancer Across the United Kingdom

David W Donnelly et al. Eur Urol. 2019 Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer incidence, treatment, and survival rates vary throughout the UK, but little is known about regional differences in quality of survival.

Objective: To investigate variations in patient-reported outcomes between UK countries and English Cancer Alliances.

Design, setting, and participants: A cross-sectional postal survey of prostate cancer survivors diagnosed 18-42mo previously.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Urinary, bowel, and sexual problems and vitality were patient reported using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire. General health was also self-assessed. Regional variations were identified using multivariable log-linear regression.

Results and limitations: A total of 35823 men responded, 60.8% of those invited. Self-assessed health was significantly lower than the UK average in Wales and Scotland. Respondents reported more urinary incontinence in Scotland, more urinary irritation/obstruction in Scotland and Northern Ireland (NI), poorer bowel function in Scotland and NI, worse sexual function in Scotland, and reduced vitality/hormonal function in Scotland, Wales, and NI. Self-assessed health was poorer than the English average in South Yorkshire and North-East and Cumbria, with more urinary incontinence in North-East and Cumbria and Peninsula, greater sexual problems in West Midlands, and poorer vitality in North-East and Cumbria and West Midlands. Limitations include difficulty identifying clinically significant differences and limited information on pretreatment conditions.

Conclusions: Despite adjustment for treatment, and clinical and sociodemographic factors, quality of survival among prostate cancer survivors varied by area of residence. Adoption of best practice from areas performing well could support enhanced survival quality in poorer performing areas, particularly with regard to bowel problems and vitality, where clinically relevant differences were reported.

Patient summary: We conducted a UK-wide survey of patient's quality of life after treatment for prostate cancer. Outcomes were found to vary depending upon where patients live. Different service providers need to ensure that all prostate cancer patients receive the same follow-up care.

Keywords: Cancer Alliances; Patient-reported outcomes; Prostate cancer; Quality of survival; Regional variation; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types