Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 6;10(1):2067.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09924-1.

Fast lithium growth and short circuit induced by localized-temperature hotspots in lithium batteries

Affiliations

Fast lithium growth and short circuit induced by localized-temperature hotspots in lithium batteries

Yangying Zhu et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Fast-charging and high-energy-density batteries pose significant safety concerns due to high rates of heat generation. Understanding how localized high temperatures affect the battery is critical but remains challenging, mainly due to the difficulty of probing battery internal temperature with high spatial resolution. Here we introduce a method to induce and sense localized high temperature inside a lithium battery using micro-Raman spectroscopy. We discover that temperature hotspots can induce significant lithium metal growth as compared to the surrounding lower temperature area due to the locally enhanced surface exchange current density. More importantly, localized high temperature can be one of the factors to cause battery internal shorting, which further elevates the temperature and increases the risk of thermal runaway. This work provides important insights on the effects of heterogeneous temperatures within batteries and aids the development of safer batteries, thermal management schemes, and diagnostic tools.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Experimental setup. a Schematic (not to scale) of a modified coin cell with an optically transparent glass window for laser access to graphene as a temperature indicator and the thermally evaporated Cu current collector. b G-band Raman peak position of the graphene as a function of the temperature. The temperature coefficient was obtained from the slope of the linear fit (dashed line). The inset shows the schematic of the calibration setup. c Temperature of the hotspot on Cu generated by a 532 nm laser in a coin cell as a function of the laser power. The dots are experimental results and the solid line is from thermal simulation in COMSOL Multiphysics
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Lithium deposition on hotspots. SEM images (top-down view) of Li deposited on Cu with hotspot temperatures of a 51 °C at a laser power of 6.7 mW, b 83 °C at 13.4 mW, and c 99 °C at 16.8 mW, respectively. The corresponding (cross-sectional view) temperature distribution from simulation near the laser spot with powers of d 6.7 mW, e 13.4 mW, and f 16.8 mW. The simulated Li deposition rate on the Cu surface (top-down view) with laser heated hotspot temperatures of g 51 °C at 6.7 mW, h 83 °C at 13.4 mW, and i 99 °C at 16.8 mW, respectively
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Hotspot-induced battery shorting. a Schematic of an optical cell with Cu and lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) as the electrodes. b Cell voltage as the battery was charged at a constant current of 30 μA. After onset of shorting, the voltage started to drop and fluctuate. Visualization of Li-plating process initially at c t0 = 0 s, before shorting at d t1 = 760 s, e t2 = 1160 s, onset of shorting at f t3 = 1480 s, and after shorting at g t4 = 1800 s
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Hotspot-induced battery shorting and local-temperature response. a Schematic of the optical cell with a resistance temperature detector (RTD) in the copper-LCO (lithium cobalt oxide) gap and a laser hotspot. b Calibration of the RTD resistance as a function of the temperature. The dots are experimental measurements and the line is linear fit. c Current (left axis) of the battery and temperature response (right axis) measured by the RTD

References

    1. Chu S, Cui Y, Liu N. The path towards sustainable energy. Nat. Mater. 2017;16:16–22. doi: 10.1038/nmat4834. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dunn B, Kamath H, Tarascon JM. Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices. Science. 2011;334:928–935. doi: 10.1126/science.1212741. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sun Y, Liu N, Cui Y. Promises and challenges of nanomaterials for lithium-based rechargeable batteries. Nat. Energy. 2016;1:16071. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.71. - DOI
    1. Goodenough JB, Kim Y. Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries. Chem. Mater. 2010;22:587–603. doi: 10.1021/cm901452z. - DOI
    1. Cheng XB, Zhang R, Zhao CZ, Zhang Q. Toward safe lithium metal anode in rechargeable batteries: a review. Chem. Rev. 2017;117:10403–10473. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00115. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types