The biodiversity intactness index may underestimate losses

Philip A Martin¹, Rhys E Green^{2

3}, Andrew Balmford²

Affiliations

¹ Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. pam79@cam.ac.uk.
² Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
³ RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, The Lodge, Sandy, UK.

Comment

Philip A Martin et al. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Jun.

. 2019 Jun;3(6):862-863.

doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-0895-1.

Philip A Martin¹, Rhys E Green^{2

3}, Andrew Balmford²

¹ Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. pam79@cam.ac.uk.
² Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
³ RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, The Lodge, Sandy, UK.

No abstract available

Comment in

Reply to 'The biodiversity intactness index may underestimate losses'.
Newbold T, Sanchez-Ortiz K, De Palma A, Hill SLL, Purvis A. Newbold T, et al. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Jun;3(6):864-865. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-0896-0. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019. PMID: 31061479 No abstract available.

Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment.
Newbold T, Hudson LN, Arnell AP, Contu S, De Palma A, Ferrier S, Hill SL, Hoskins AJ, Lysenko I, Phillips HR, Burton VJ, Chng CW, Emerson S, Gao D, Pask-Hale G, Hutton J, Jung M, Sanchez-Ortiz K, Simmons BI, Whitmee S, Zhang H, Scharlemann JP, Purvis A. Newbold T, et al. Science. 2016 Jul 15;353(6296):288-91. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2201. Science. 2016. PMID: 27418509