Reply to 'The biodiversity intactness index may underestimate losses'

Tim Newbold¹, Katia Sanchez-Ortiz², Adriana De Palma², Samantha L L Hill^{2

3}, Andy Purvis^{2

4}

Affiliations

¹ Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK. t.newbold@ucl.ac.uk.
² Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.
³ UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK.
⁴ Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Comment

Tim Newbold et al. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Jun.

. 2019 Jun;3(6):864-865.

doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-0896-0.

Tim Newbold¹, Katia Sanchez-Ortiz², Adriana De Palma², Samantha L L Hill^{2

3}, Andy Purvis^{2

4}

¹ Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK. t.newbold@ucl.ac.uk.
² Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK.
³ UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK.
⁴ Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.

No abstract available

Comment on

Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment.
Newbold T, Hudson LN, Arnell AP, Contu S, De Palma A, Ferrier S, Hill SL, Hoskins AJ, Lysenko I, Phillips HR, Burton VJ, Chng CW, Emerson S, Gao D, Pask-Hale G, Hutton J, Jung M, Sanchez-Ortiz K, Simmons BI, Whitmee S, Zhang H, Scharlemann JP, Purvis A. Newbold T, et al. Science. 2016 Jul 15;353(6296):288-91. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2201. Science. 2016. PMID: 27418509
The biodiversity intactness index may underestimate losses.
Martin PA, Green RE, Balmford A. Martin PA, et al. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Jun;3(6):862-863. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-0895-1. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019. PMID: 31061478 No abstract available.