Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 24:8:432.
doi: 10.4102/ajod.v8i0.432. eCollection 2019.

Community-based rehabilitation workers' perspectives of wheelchair provision in Uganda: A qualitative study

Affiliations

Community-based rehabilitation workers' perspectives of wheelchair provision in Uganda: A qualitative study

Nikola Seymour et al. Afr J Disabil. .

Abstract

Background: The challenges of wheelchair provision and use in less resourced settings are the focus of global efforts to enhance wheelchair service delivery. The shortage of professional wheelchair service providers in these settings necessitates the collaboration of multiple stakeholders, including community-based rehabilitation (CBR) workers, whose role needs to be further understood.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine what CBR workers in three areas of Uganda perceived as (1) the challenges with wheelchair provision and use, (2) the factors contributing to these challenges, (3) the role they themselves can potentially play and (4) what facilitators they need to achieve this.

Method: This qualitative study in the transformative paradigm comprised focus group discussions to gather perceptions from 21 CBR workers in three areas of Uganda, each with an operational wheelchair service, participant observations and field notes. Thematic analysis of data was implemented.

Results: Community-based rehabilitation workers' perceptions of challenges were similar while perceived causes of challenges differed as influenced by location, historical and current wheelchair availability and the CBR workers' roles. Their main responsibilities included assistance in overcoming barriers to access the service, transfer of skills and knowledge related to wheelchairs, follow-up of users for wheelchair-related problem-solving, and user and community empowerment.

Conclusion: Community-based rehabilitation workers can contribute in various ways to wheelchair service delivery and inclusion of wheelchair users; however, their capabilities are not consistently applied. Considering the diversity of contextual challenges, CBR workers' range of responsive approaches, knowledge of networks and ability to work in the community make their input valuable. However, to optimise their contribution, specific planning for their training and financial needs and effective engagement in the wheelchair services delivery system are essential.

Keywords: wheelchairs; less resourced settings; community-based rehabilitation; wheelchair service provision; service steps; Uganda; empowerment; inclusion; assistive device.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests with regard to the writing of this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The three areas in Uganda from which participants were recruited: Kisubi in the Central region (bottom right), Kasese in the Eastern region (left) and Gulu in the Northern region (top).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abimanyi-Ochom J. & Mannan H., 2014, ‘Uganda’s disability journey: Progress and challenges’, African Journal of Disability 3(1), Art. #108, 6 pages. 10.4102/ajod.v3i1.108 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banda-Chalwe M., Nitz J.C. & De Jonge D., 2014, ‘Impact of inaccessible spaces on community participation of people with mobility limitations in Zambia’, African Journal of Disability 3(1), Art. #33, 17 pages. 10.4102/ajod.v3i1.33 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bazant E.S., Himelfarb Hurwitz E.J., Onguti B.N., Williams E.K., Noon J.N., Xavier C.A. et al. , 2017, ‘Wheelchair services and use outcomes: A cross-sectional survey in Kenya and the Philippines’, African Journal of Disability 6(0), a318 10.4102/ajod.v6i0.318 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birks M., Chapman Y. & Francis K., 2008, ‘Memoing in qualitative research: Probing data and processes’, Journal of Research in Nursing 13(1), 68–75. 10.1177/1744987107081254 - DOI
    1. Booyens M, Van Pletzen E. & Lorenzo T., 2015, ‘The complexity of rural contexts experienced by community disability workers in three southern African countries’, African Journal of Disability 4(1), Art. #167, 9 pages. 10.4102/ajod.v4i1.167 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources