Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Jun;45(6):844-855.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05620-2. Epub 2019 May 6.

Vasopressin in septic shock: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Vasopressin in septic shock: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Myura Nagendran et al. Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis to investigate the possible benefits and harms of vasopressin therapy in adults with septic shock both overall and in pre-defined subgroups.

Methods: Our pre-specified study protocol is published on PROSPERO, CRD42017071698. We identified randomised clinical trials up to January 2019 investigating vasopressin therapy versus any other vasoactive comparator in adults with septic shock. Individual patient data from each trial were compiled. Conventional two-stage meta-analyses were performed as well as one-stage regression models with single treatment covariate interactions for subgroup analyses.

Results: Four trials were included with a total of 1453 patients. For the primary outcomes, there was no effect of vasopressin on 28-day mortality [relative risk (RR) 0.98, 95% CI 0.86-1.12] or serious adverse events (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.82-1.26). Vasopressin led to more digital ischaemia [absolute risk difference (ARD) 1.7%, 95% CI 0.3%-3.2%] but fewer arrhythmias (ARD - 2.8%, 95% CI - 0.2% to - 5.3%). Mesenteric ischaemia and acute coronary syndrome events were similar between groups. Vasopressin reduced the requirement for renal replacement therapy (RRT) (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74-0.99), but this finding was not robust to sensitivity analyses. There were no statistically significant interactions in the pre-defined subgroups (baseline kidney injury severity, baseline lactate, baseline norepinephrine requirement and time to study inclusion).

Conclusions: Vasopressin therapy in septic shock had no effect on 28-day mortality although the confidence intervals are wide. It appears safe but with a different side effect profile from norepinephrine. The finding on reduced RRT should be interpreted cautiously. Future trials should focus on long-term outcomes in select patient groups as well as incorporating cost effectiveness analyses regarding possible reduced RRT use.

Keywords: Individual patient data; Meta-analysis; Septic shock; Vasopressin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Circulation. 1997 Mar 4;95(5):1122-5 - PubMed
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jan;36(1):57-65 - PubMed
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 May 1;189(9):1075-81 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10 - PubMed
    1. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R46 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources