Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov;44(11):3549-3558.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01996-3.

Current controversy, confusion, and imprecision in the use and interpretation of rectal MRI

Affiliations
Review

Current controversy, confusion, and imprecision in the use and interpretation of rectal MRI

Marc J Gollub et al. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Nov.

Abstract

There has been a rapid increase in the utilization of MRI in rectal cancer staging in the USA essentially replacing endorectal ultrasound and mimicking the trend in Europe seen in the 1990s and 2000s. Accompanying this trend, there is a demand, and recognized need, for greater precision and clarification of confusing, misunderstood and poorly understood concepts, facts, statements and nomenclature regarding rectal cancer and the use of pelvic MRI for diagnosis. As such, this Review, part evidence-based and part expert opinion, will attempt to elucidate and clarify several concepts the authors have encountered in 25 years of imaging rectal cancer, focusing on MRI.

Keywords: Opinion; Rectal Cancer; Restaging; Staging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Sagittal T2 weighted MRI of the pelvis in 42-year-old male with a polypoid rectal adenocarcinoma. Measurement of height of tumor from lower border of external anal sphincter [EAS] (corresponding to histologic anal verge), yellow lines. Measurement of height of tumor from bottom of internal anal sphincter [IAS] (often corresponding to surgical anal verge due to anesthesia induced skeletal muscle relaxation or forcible manual separation of EAS at time of sigmoidoscopy. Difference in these distances is only about 1-cm and represents the intersphincteric notch (asterisk).
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Axial T2 weighted elvic MRI at multiple levels. Anatomical classification of lateral lymph nodes in 2 different middle-aged male patients with rectal cancer (primary lesions not shown). A (proximal nodes) and B (distal nodes): Red-shaded areas are external iliac nodes, blue shaded areas are obturator nodes and green shaded areas are internal iliac nodes. Division between obturator and internal iliac represented by vertical plane through axis of internal iliac vessel. Lateral to this are obturator nodes .EIA = external iliac artery, EIV = external iliac vein, ob a/v/n = obturator artery//nerve, IOM = internal obturator muscle, int pud a/v = internal pudendal artery/vein, IIV = internal iliac vein, IIA = internal iliac artery. C and D, malignant pelvic sidewall nodes: Enlarged heterogeneous obturator nodes on the left in C, (solid arrow). Enlarged minimally heterogeneous left obturator node in D not removed initially leading to pelvic sidewall recurrence 9 months following surgery (solid arrow). Clinically unimportant posterior external iliac elongated lymph nodes (dashed arrow). IOM = internal obturator muscle. Int pud a/v = internal pudendal artery and vein 9enclosed in dotted circle), EIV = external iliac vein. IIA/V = internal iliac artery and vein.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Pelvic MRI in middle-aged female with recurrent mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma. A: Axial T2 weighted image. High T2 signal intensity mass in mid pelvis and asymmetric appearance of piriformis muscles. More normal appearing on the left. High T2 weighted soft tissue along right sciatic notch seems to represent fat due to its iso-intensity. B: Fat -saturated T1 weighted contrast-enhanced image. Note enhancement around central mass and tumor extending out of sciatic notch, now more conspicuous.

References

    1. Weiser M, Paper about treatment changes and survival and MRI usage. Pending, 2019.
    1. Siegel RL, et al., Colorectal Cancer Incidence Patterns in the United States, 1974–2013. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2017. 109(8). - PMC - PubMed
    1. al. K.D.e., Rectal Cancer Hands On Workshop. 2018.
    1. al. G.M.e., Rectal Cancer Workshop. 2018.
    1. Glimelius B, et al., Mesorectal fascia instead of circumferential resection margin in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2011. 29(16): p. 2142–3. - PubMed