Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2019 Nov;19(11):3087-3099.
doi: 10.1111/ajt.15416. Epub 2019 May 28.

Absolute quantification of donor-derived cell-free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Absolute quantification of donor-derived cell-free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study

Michael Oellerich et al. Am J Transplant. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a noninvasive biomarker for comprehensive monitoring of allograft injury and rejection in kidney transplantation (KTx). dd-cfDNA quantification of copies/mL plasma (dd-cfDNA[cp/mL]) was compared to dd-cfDNA fraction (dd-cfDNA[%]) at prespecified visits in 189 patients over 1 year post KTx. In patients (N = 15, n = 22 samples) with biopsy-proven rejection (BPR), median dd-cfDNA(cp/mL) was 3.3-fold and median dd-cfDNA(%) 2.0-fold higher (82 cp/mL; 0.57%, respectively) than medians in Stable Phase patients (N = 83, n = 408) without rejection (25 cp/mL; 0.29%). Results for acute tubular necrosis (ATN) were not significantly different from those with biopsy-proven rejection (BPR). dd-cfDNA identified unnecessary biopsies triggered by a rise in plasma creatinine. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed superior performance (P = .02) of measuring dd-cfDNA(cp/mL) (AUC = 0.83) compared to dd-cfDNA(%) (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73). Diagnostic odds ratios were 7.31 for dd-cfDNA(cp/mL), and 6.02 for dd-cfDNA(%) at thresholds of 52 cp/mL and 0.43%, respectively. Plasma creatinine showed a low correlation (r = 0.37) with dd-cfDNA(cp/mL). In a patient subset (N = 24) there was a significantly higher rate of patients with elevated dd-cfDNA(cp/mL) with lower tacrolimus levels (<8 μg/L) compared to the group with higher tacrolimus concentrations (P = .0036) suggesting that dd-cfDNA may detect inadequate immunosuppression resulting in subclinical graft damage. Absolute dd-cfDNA(cp/mL) allowed for better discrimination than dd-cfDNA(%) of KTx patients with BPR and is useful to avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Keywords: biomarker; clinical decision-making; clinical research/practice; immunosuppressant; immunosuppression/immune modulation; kidney failure/injury; kidney transplantation/nephrology; rejection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection of patients with samples included in statistical analyses based on compliance with predetermined inclusion criteria. KTx, kidney transplant
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time course in plasma dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) (A) and dd‐cfDNA(%) (B) during the first year after KTx in patients' samples of Non‐rejecting Phase. Boxes represent median with interquartile range, with whiskers showing the 5th‐95th percentile. Predetermined visits and number of samples (n) are given below each time point. Values for outliers are shown as numbers (either as cp/mL or %). dd‐cfDNA, donor‐derived cell‐free DNA; KTx, kidney transplant
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of post KTx dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) (A) and dd‐cfDNA(%) (B) data from samples beginning at day 5 post‐KTx. ATN, acute tubular necrosis; BPR, biopsy‐proven rejection; dd‐cfDNA, donor‐derived cell‐free DNA; KTx, kidney transplant; TCMR, T cell‐mediated rejection
Figure 4
Figure 4
ROC curves for dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) (A) and dd‐cfDNA(%) (B) showing the superior performance (P = .02) of measuring the absolute amount (cp/mL) of dd‐cfDNA rather than the dd‐cfDNA fraction(%). Outliers in the Stable Phase group were excluded from analysis. AUC, area under the curve; BPR, biopsy‐proven rejection; CI, confidence interval; dd‐cfDNA, donor‐derived cell‐free DNA; ROC, receiver operating characteristic
Figure 5
Figure 5
Same‐day plasma creatinine, dd‐cfDNA(%) and dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) results in samples drawn during the period from 6 days before to 6 days after the biopsy, but excluding the day of the biopsy, in seven patients who had normal biopsy findings. Shaded areas show values below the upper limit of the plasma creatinine reference interval and thresholds for dd‐cfDNA. dd‐cfDNA, donor‐derived cell‐free DNA
Figure 6
Figure 6
Association between low predose tacrolimus concentrations and increased dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) in patients (N = 24) with a change of tacrolimus concentration >60% in samples (n = 75) collected at three consecutive visits. Lines represent the cut‐off points for Fisher test (Tacrolimus: 8 μg/L; dd‐cfDNA: 50 cp/mL). BPR, biopsy‐proven rejection; dd‐cfDNA, donor‐derived cell‐free DNA

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Snyder TM, Khush KK, Valantine HA, et al. Universal noninvasive detection of solid organ transplant rejection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:6229‐6234. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Vlaminck I, Valantine HA, Snyder TM, et al. Circulating cell‐free DNA enables noninvasive diagnosis of heart transplant rejection. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:241ra77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schütz E, Fischer A, Beck J, et al. Graft‐derived cell‐free DNA, a noninvasive early rejection and graft damage marker in liver transplantation: a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study. PLoS Med. 2017;14:e1002286. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bloom RD, Bromberg JS, Poggio ED, et al. Cell‐free DNA and active rejection in kidney allografts. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:2221‐2232. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Knight SR, Thorne A, Faro MLL. Donor‐specific cell‐free DNA as a biomarker in solid organ transplantation. A systematic review. Transplantation. 2018;103:273‐283. - PubMed

Publication types