Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May;25(3):183-188.
doi: 10.5152/dir.2019.19125.

Artificial intelligence at the intersection of pathology and radiology in prostate cancer

Affiliations
Review

Artificial intelligence at the intersection of pathology and radiology in prostate cancer

Stephnie A Harmon et al. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019 May.

Abstract

Pathologic grading plays a key role in prostate cancer risk stratification and treatment selection, traditionally assessed from systemic core needle biopsies sampled throughout the prostate gland. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has become a well-established clinical tool for detecting and localizing prostate cancer. However, both pathologic and radiologic assessment suffer from poor reproducibility among readers. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods show promise in aiding the detection and assessment of imaging-based tasks, dependent on the curation of high-quality training sets. This review provides an overview of recent advances in AI applied to mpMRI and digital pathology in prostate cancer which enable advanced characterization of disease through combined radiology-pathology assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest disclosure

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Example mpMRI (T2-weighted and ADC images) with corresponding whole mount hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) section demonstrating two pathologically-defined tumors. Overall assessment in this patient resulted in Gleason grade 3+4 score assignment, resulting in weak labels derived from total tumor extent. However, detailed pathologic assessment demonstrates majority of Gleason pattern 4 is located in the anterior portion of the tumor, with predominately Gleason pattern 3 throughout remainder of the tumor field. Opportunities for improved spatial learning include density mapping of dominant pathologic grading and exclusion of non-cancerous structures within tumor field.

References

    1. Grönberg H. Prostate cancer epidemiology. Lancet. 2003;361:859–864. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12713-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Costa DN, Pedrosa I, Donato F, Jr, Roehrborn CG, Rofsky NM. MR imaging–transrectal US fusion for targeted prostate biopsies: implications for diagnosis and clinical management. Radiographics. 2015;35:696–708. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015140058. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gleason DF. Classification of prostatic carcinomas. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966;50:125–128. - PubMed
    1. Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, et al. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:244–252. - PubMed
    1. Kweldam CF, Wildhagen MF, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, van der Kwast TH, van Leenders GJ. Cribriform growth is highly predictive for postoperative metastasis and disease-specific death in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. Mod Pathol. 2015;28:457–464. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2014.116. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms