Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 May 7;321(17):1702-1715.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3820.

Association of Gestational Weight Gain With Adverse Maternal and Infant Outcomes

LifeCycle Project-Maternal Obesity and Childhood Outcomes Study GroupEllis Voerman  1   2 Susana Santos  1   2 Hazel Inskip  3   4 Pilar Amiano  5   6   7 Henrique Barros  8   9 Marie-Aline Charles  10   11 Leda Chatzi  12   13   14 George P Chrousos  15 Eva Corpeleijn  16 Sarah Crozier  3 Myriam Doyon  17 Merete Eggesbø  18 Maria Pia Fantini  19 Sara Farchi  20 Francesco Forastiere  20 Vagelis Georgiu  13 Davide Gori  19 Wojciech Hanke  21 Irva Hertz-Picciotto  22 Barbara Heude  10   11 Marie-France Hivert  17   23   24 Daniel Hryhorczuk  25 Carmen Iñiguez  7   26 Anne M Karvonen  27 Leanne K Küpers  16   28   29   30 Hanna Lagström  31 Debbie A Lawlor  29   30 Irina Lehmann  32 Per Magnus  33 Renata Majewska  34 Johanna Mäkelä  35 Yannis Manios  36 Monique Mommers  37 Camilla S Morgen  38   39 George Moschonis  40 Ellen A Nohr  41 Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen  39 Emily Oken  23 Agnieszka Pac  34 Eleni Papadopoulou  42 Juha Pekkanen  27   43 Costanza Pizzi  44 Kinga Polanska  21 Daniela Porta  20 Lorenzo Richiardi  44 Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman  23 Nel Roeleveld  45 Luca Ronfani  46 Ana C Santos  8   9 Marie Standl  47 Hein Stigum  48 Camilla Stoltenberg  49   50 Elisabeth Thiering  47   51 Carel Thijs  37 Maties Torrent  52 Tomas Trnovec  53 Marleen M H J van Gelder  45   54 Lenie van Rossem  55 Andrea von Berg  56 Martine Vrijheid  7   57   58 Alet Wijga  59 Oleksandr Zvinchuk  60 Thorkild I A Sørensen  39   61 Keith Godfrey  3   4 Vincent W V Jaddoe  1   2   62 Romy Gaillard  1   2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Association of Gestational Weight Gain With Adverse Maternal and Infant Outcomes

LifeCycle Project-Maternal Obesity and Childhood Outcomes Study Group et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Both low and high gestational weight gain have been associated with adverse maternal and infant outcomes, but optimal gestational weight gain remains uncertain and not well defined for all prepregnancy weight ranges.

Objectives: To examine the association of ranges of gestational weight gain with risk of adverse maternal and infant outcomes and estimate optimal gestational weight gain ranges across prepregnancy body mass index categories.

Design, setting, and participants: Individual participant-level meta-analysis using data from 196 670 participants within 25 cohort studies from Europe and North America (main study sample). Optimal gestational weight gain ranges were estimated for each prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) category by selecting the range of gestational weight gain that was associated with lower risk for any adverse outcome. Individual participant-level data from 3505 participants within 4 separate hospital-based cohorts were used as a validation sample. Data were collected between 1989 and 2015. The final date of follow-up was December 2015.

Exposures: Gestational weight gain.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome termed any adverse outcome was defined as the presence of 1 or more of the following outcomes: preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, cesarean delivery, preterm birth, and small or large size for gestational age at birth.

Results: Of the 196 670 women (median age, 30.0 years [quartile 1 and 3, 27.0 and 33.0 years] and 40 937 were white) included in the main sample, 7809 (4.0%) were categorized at baseline as underweight (BMI <18.5); 133 788 (68.0%), normal weight (BMI, 18.5-24.9); 38 828 (19.7%), overweight (BMI, 25.0-29.9); 11 992 (6.1%), obesity grade 1 (BMI, 30.0-34.9); 3284 (1.7%), obesity grade 2 (BMI, 35.0-39.9); and 969 (0.5%), obesity grade 3 (BMI, ≥40.0). Overall, any adverse outcome occurred in 37.2% (n = 73 161) of women, ranging from 34.7% (2706 of 7809) among women categorized as underweight to 61.1% (592 of 969) among women categorized as obesity grade 3. Optimal gestational weight gain ranges were 14.0 kg to less than 16.0 kg for women categorized as underweight; 10.0 kg to less than 18.0 kg for normal weight; 2.0 kg to less than 16.0 kg for overweight; 2.0 kg to less than 6.0 kg for obesity grade 1; weight loss or gain of 0 kg to less than 4.0 kg for obesity grade 2; and weight gain of 0 kg to less than 6.0 kg for obesity grade 3. These gestational weight gain ranges were associated with low to moderate discrimination between those with and those without adverse outcomes (range for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.55-0.76). Results for discriminative performance in the validation sample were similar to the corresponding results in the main study sample (range for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.51-0.79).

Conclusions and relevance: In this meta-analysis of pooled individual participant data from 25 cohort studies, the risk for adverse maternal and infant outcomes varied by gestational weight gain and across the range of prepregnancy weights. The estimates of optimal gestational weight gain may inform prenatal counseling; however, the optimal gestational weight gain ranges had limited predictive value for the outcomes assessed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Godfrey reported receiving speakers fees from companies selling nutritional products; and being part of an academic consortium that has received research funding from Abbott Nutrition, Nestec, and Danone. Dr Lawlor reported receiving support from Roche Diagnostics and Medtronic for biomarker research. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Heatmap of Absolute Risk for Any Adverse Maternal or Infant Outcome
Values represent the absolute risks of any adverse maternal and infant outcome (left panel) and the percentages of participants (right panel) for each combination of body mass index and gestational weight gain. Absolute risk was calculated as No. of participants (any adverse outcome)/No. of participants (body mass index and gestational weight gain category) × 100. The percentages of participants were calculated as the number of participants with each combination of body mass index and gestational weight gain as a percentage of the total study sample. The total study sample size was 196 670. Participants in the extreme categories of prepregnancy body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) and gestational weight gain had values beyond the most extreme labeled tick marks. Any adverse outcome includes preeclampsia (gestational hypertension plus proteinuria), gestational hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg, or both after 20 weeks of gestation in previously normotensive women), gestational diabetes (a random glucose level >11.0 mmol/L, a fasting glucose level ≥7.0 mmol/L, or a fasting glucose level between 6.1 and 6.9 mmol/L with a subsequent abnormal glucose tolerance test [glucose level >7.8 mmol/L after glucose intake]), cesarean delivery, preterm birth (gestational age at birth <37 weeks), and small or large size for gestational age at birth (sex- and gestational age–adjusted birth weight <10th percentile and >90th percentile, respectively).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Absolute Risk for Adverse Maternal or Infant Outcomes
Absolute risk was calculated as (No. of women with adverse outcome/No. of women in gestational weight gain category within body mass index group) × 100. The symbols represent the absolute risk for women in each gestational weight gain category. The gestational weight gain categories were 2 kg each. Participants in the extreme categories of gestational weight gain had values beyond the most extreme labeled tick marks. The maternal body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) categories were underweight (<18.5), normal weight (18.5-24.9), overweight (25.0-29.9), obesity grade 1 (30.0-34.9), obesity grade 2 (35.0-39.9), and obesity grade 3 (≥40.0). Any adverse outcome includes preeclampsia (gestational hypertension plus proteinuria), gestational hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg, or both after 20 weeks of gestation in previously normotensive women), gestational diabetes (a random glucose level >11.0 mmol/L, a fasting glucose level ≥7.0 mmol/L, or a fasting glucose level between 6.1 and 6.9 mmol/L with a subsequent abnormal glucose tolerance test [glucose level >7.8 mmol/L after glucose intake]), cesarean delivery, preterm birth (gestational age at birth <37 weeks), and small or large size for gestational age at birth (sex- and gestational age–adjusted birth weight <10th percentile and >90th percentile, respectively). The odds ratios for the risk of any adverse outcome were 1.28 (95% CI, 1.27-1.29) and 1.04 (95% CI, 1.03-1.05) per 1-SD increase in maternal prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain, respectively (P < .001 for comparison). The number of cases for each outcome and the total number of participants in each gestational weight gain category appears in eTable 7 in the Supplement.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Associations of Gestational Weight Gain Categories With Any Adverse Outcome
OR indicates odds ratio and it reflects the risk for any adverse outcome per gestational weight gain category for women with underweight, normal weight, overweight, obesity grade 1, obesity grade 2, and obesity grade 3, parts A-F, respectively, compared with all other gestational weight gain categories in that specific group for clinical maternal body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). The solid circles represent the OR for all participants in each gestational weight gain category. The error bars indicate 95% CIs. The blue area represents the optimal gestational weight gain range according to the current analysis, the gray area represents the gestational weight gain ranges recommended by the US National Academy of Medicine (NAM; formerly the Institute of Medicine). The gestational weight gain categories were 2 kg each. Participants in the extreme categories of gestational weight gain had values beyond the most extreme labeled tick marks. The maternal BMI categories were underweight (<18.5), normal weight (18.5-24.9), overweight (25.0-29.9), obesity grade 1 (30.0-34.9), obesity grade 2 (35.0-39.9), and obesity grade 3 (≥40.0). Any adverse outcome includes preeclampsia (gestational hypertension plus proteinuria), gestational hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg, or both after 20 weeks of gestation in previously normotensive women), gestational diabetes (a random glucose level >11.0 mmol/L, a fasting glucose level ≥7.0 mmol/L, or a fasting glucose level between 6.1 and 6.9 mmol/L with a subsequent abnormal glucose tolerance test [glucose level >7.8 mmol/L after glucose intake]), cesarean delivery, preterm birth (gestational age at birth <37 weeks), and small or large size for gestational age at birth (sex- and gestational age–adjusted birth weight <10th percentile and >90th percentile, respectively). For the gestational weight gain ranges defined in this study, a statistically significant OR lower than 1 for a gestational weight gain category was considered the optimal weight gain. If a nonsignificant association (either with an OR >1, <1, or of 1) for a gestational weight gain category was surrounded by 2 significant estimates with an OR below 1, that gestational weight gain category was included in the optimal gestational weight gain range. The number of cases for each outcome and the total number of participants in each gestational weight gain category appear in eTable 7 in the Supplement. The optimal gestational weight gain ranges based only on protective associations appear in eFigure 5 in the Supplement.

Comment in

References

    1. Goldstein RF, Abell SK, Ranasinha S, et al. . Association of gestational weight gain with maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2017;317(21):2207-2225. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.3635 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nehring I, Schmoll S, Beyerlein A, Hauner H, von Kries R. Gestational weight gain and long-term postpartum weight retention: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(5):1225-1231. doi:10.3945/ajcn.111.015289 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mamun AA, Mannan M, Doi SA. Gestational weight gain in relation to offspring obesity over the life course: a systematic review and bias-adjusted meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2014;15(4):338-347. doi:10.1111/obr.12132 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gaillard R. Maternal obesity during pregnancy and cardiovascular development and disease in the offspring. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30(11):1141-1152. doi:10.1007/s10654-015-0085-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aune D, Saugstad OD, Henriksen T, Tonstad S. Maternal body mass index and the risk of fetal death, stillbirth, and infant death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2014;311(15):1536-1546. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.2269 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types