Talking to others' selves: Why a valuational paradigm of agency fails to provide an adequate theoretical framework for moral responsibility, social accountability, and legal liability
- PMID: 31064429
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X17000759
Talking to others' selves: Why a valuational paradigm of agency fails to provide an adequate theoretical framework for moral responsibility, social accountability, and legal liability
Abstract
In this commentary, I highlight the importance of a proper discussion of the pragmatic implications of John Doris's paradigm for allocation of personal responsibility proposed in his new book Talking to Our Selves. By employing some classic concepts of the American common law tradition, I discuss why Doris's valuational understanding of agency fails to provide an adequate framework for moral responsibility, social accountability, and legal liability.
Comment in
-
Collaborating agents: Values, sociality, and moral responsibility.Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e65. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001935. Behav Brain Sci. 2018. PMID: 31064447
Comment on
-
Précis of Talking to Our Selves: Reflection, Ignorance, and Agency.Behav Brain Sci. 2018;41:e36. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16002016. Epub 2016 Nov 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2018. PMID: 27894379
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
