What have we learned? What can we learn?
- PMID: 31064559
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X18000870
What have we learned? What can we learn?
Abstract
We advocate that replications should be an integral part of the scientific discourse and provide insights about the conditions under which an effect occurs. By themselves, mere nonreplications are not informative about the "truth" of an effect. As a consequence, the mechanistic continuation of multilab replications should be replaced by diagnostic studies providing insights about the underlying causes and mechanisms.
Comment in
-
Improving social and behavioral science by making replication mainstream: A response to commentaries.Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e157. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18000961. Behav Brain Sci. 2018. PMID: 31064530
Comment on
-
Making replication mainstream.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Oct 25;41:e120. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001972. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29065933
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials