Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;130(4):E155-E162.
doi: 10.1002/lary.28037. Epub 2019 May 9.

Submandibular gland flap for reconstruction after parotidectomy

Affiliations

Submandibular gland flap for reconstruction after parotidectomy

Kevin Y Liang et al. Laryngoscope. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis: Description of a novel use of a submandibular gland (SMG) flap pedicled on the facial vessels to restore facial volume after parotidectomy, and comparison of clinical outcomes with alternative modes of reconstruction.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Methods: The surgical technique for a SMG flap is described. Retrospective chart review of cases of parotidectomy at a single tertiary medical center was conducted (n = 43). Cases were grouped in three cohorts of consecutive patients depending on reconstruction technique: SMG flap (n = 13), sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) flap (n = 15), and no flap (n = 15). Cohort characteristics and complication rates are reported.

Results: The SMG flap was more often used for a malignant pathology (92%) and in conjunction with a neck dissection (100%), compared to the SCM flap (47% and 15%) or no flap (0% and 0%), respectively. The mean House-Brackmann score in the immediate postoperative period in the SMG-flap group was slightly elevated compared to the other groups: 1.6 (standard deviation [SD] ± 0.5) versus 1.1 (SD ± 0.3) and 1.0 (SD ± 0.0). Otherwise, the complication rate was similar across groups.

Conclusions: The SMG flap is a safe and effective option for volume restoration after parotidectomy. It provides durable volume that will not atrophy and is already exposed in the field of dissection for patients undergoing concurrent level I neck dissection.

Level of evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 130:E155-E162, 2020.

Keywords: Parotidectomy; reconstruction; sternocleidomastoid; submandibular gland; transfer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

    1. Mantsopoulos K, Koch M, Klintworth N, Zenk J, Iro H. Evolution and changing trends in surgery for benign parotid tumors. Laryngoscope 2015;125:122-127.
    1. Skolnik EM, Friedman M, Becker S, Sisson GA, Keyes GA. Tumors of the major salivary glands. Laryngoscope 1977;87:843-861.
    1. Spiro RH. Salivary neoplasms: overview of a 35-year experience with 2,807 patients. Head Neck Surg 1986;8:177-184.
    1. Nitzan D, Kronenberg J, Horowitz Z, et al. Quality of life following parotidectomy for malignant and benign disease. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1060-1067.
    1. Irvine LE, Larian B, Azizzadeh B. Locoregional Parotid Reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2016;49:435-446.

LinkOut - more resources