Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 9;9(1):7135.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43494-y.

Polymeric nanoparticles as an alternative for application of gibberellic acid in sustainable agriculture: a field study

Affiliations

Polymeric nanoparticles as an alternative for application of gibberellic acid in sustainable agriculture: a field study

Anderson do Espírito Santo Pereira et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Nanocarrier systems for the encapsulation of agrochemicals can contribute to sustainable agriculture, but few nanosystems have been developed for plant growth regulators (PGRs). The present study evaluated the effects of seed priming using alginate/chitosan (nanoALG/CS) and chitosan/tripolyphosphate (nanoCS/TPP) containing GA3 on the growth and productivity of Solanum lycopersicum cultivated under field conditions. The results demonstrated that nanocarrier systems could improve fruit production, with the productivity increasing almost 4-fold using nanoALG/CS-GA3. This pioneering study demonstrates the potential of nanocarrier systems with PGRs for applications in agriculture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Initial seedling growth 30 days after sowing: (a) shoot length (cm); (b) shoot dry weight (mg); (c) root length (cm); (d) root dry weight (mg). Seed treatments using the stock solution and dilutions of 1:10 and 1:100 (v/v), equivalent to concentrations of 0.05, 0.005, and 0.0005 mg/mL, respectively. Data shown as means and standard deviations (n = 12). Statistical analyses using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test (significance level of p < 0.05), where α, β, and δ indicate significant differences relative to the control (water), treatment with GA3, and treatment with nanoCS/TPP-GA3, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evaluation of plant development 120 days after sowing: (a) length of the aerial part (cm); (b) dry weight of the aerial part (g); (c) number of fruits per plant; (d) fruit fresh weight (g). Seed treatments using the stock solution and dilutions of 1:10 and 1:100 (v/v), equivalent to concentrations of 0.05, 0.005, and 0.0005 mg/mL, respectively. Data presented as means and standard deviations (n = 12). Statistical analyses using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test (significance level of p < 0.05), where α, β, and δ indicate significant differences relative to the control (water), treatment with GA3, and treatment with nanoCS/TPP-GA3, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Estimation of plant production, considering the fresh fruit weight (ton) for an area of 10000 m2 (1 ha). Seed treatments using the stock solution and dilutions of 1:10 and 1:100 (v/v), equivalent to concentrations of 0.05, 0.005, and 0.0005 mg/mL, respectively. Data presented as means and standard deviations (n = 12). Statistical analyses using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test (significance level of p < 0.05), where α, β, and δ indicate significant differences relative to the control (water), treatment with GA3, and treatment with nanoCS/TPP-GA3, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Efficacies of the nanoALG/CS-GA3 and nanoCS/TPP-GA3 systems, relative to the use of GA3, for the different parameters evaluated 120 days after sowing (a) length of the aerial part (b) dry weight of the aerial part (c) number of fruits (d) fruit weight. Seed treatments using the stock solution and dilutions of 1:10 and 1:100 (v/v), equivalent to concentrations of 0.05, 0.005, and 0.0005 mg/mL, respectively. Data presented as means and standard deviations (n = 12). Statistical analyses using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test (significance level of p < 0.05), where α indicates significant difference relative to the treatment with nanoCS/TPP-GA3.

References

    1. Norton L.R. Is it time for a socio-ecological revolution in agriculture? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2016;235:13–16. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.007. - DOI
    1. Duhan JS, et al. Nanotechnology: The new perspective in precision agriculture. Biotechnol. Rep. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2017.03.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. King Thea, Cole Martin, Farber Jeffrey M., Eisenbrand Gerhard, Zabaras Dimitrios, Fox Edward M., Hill Jeremy P. Food safety for food security: Relationship between global megatrends and developments in food safety. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2017;68:160–175. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.014. - DOI
    1. Mishra, S., Keswani, C., Abhilash, P. C., Fraceto, L. F. & Singh, H. B. Integrated approach of agrinanotechnology: challenges and future trends. Front. Plant Sci, 10.3389/fpls.2017.00471 (2017). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iavicoli Ivo, Leso Veruscka, Beezhold Donald H., Shvedova Anna A. Nanotechnology in agriculture: Opportunities, toxicological implications, and occupational risks. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 2017;329:96–111. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2017.05.025. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types