Comparative Effectiveness of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine-Midazolam versus Oral Chloral Hydrate Targeting Moderate Sedation during Pediatric Transthoracic Echocardiograms
- PMID: 31073445
- PMCID: PMC6260306
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597696
Comparative Effectiveness of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine-Midazolam versus Oral Chloral Hydrate Targeting Moderate Sedation during Pediatric Transthoracic Echocardiograms
Abstract
Objective To compare efficacy and safety of two moderate sedation regimens for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE): intranasal dexmedetomidine-midazolam (DM) versus oral chloral hydrate (CH) syrup. Method This was a retrospective cohort of 93 children under 4 years of age receiving moderate sedation with either DM or CH for TTE from January 2011 through December 2014. Measurements and Main Results Forty-nine patients received oral CH and 44 received the intranasal combination of DM. The demographics between groups were similar except the DM patients were slightly older and heavier (each p < 0.05). Failure rate between groups did not reach statistical significance (CH 14.3% vs. DM 6.8%; p = 0.324). Total sedation to discharge time was similar between groups (CH 89.4 minutes vs. DM 89.6 minute; p = 0.97). Cardiopulmonary data did reveal a significantly lower heart rate (101.9 vs. 91.7; p < 0.001) and respiratory rate (23.4 vs. 21.0, p = 0.03) in the DM group, but no difference in blood pressure measurements or echo determined shortening fraction. Conclusion These data support the use of intranasal DM as a safe and efficacious method of moderate sedation for children undergoing TTE.
Keywords: chloral hydrate; intranasal dexmedetomidine–midazolam; transthoracic echocardiography.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Tait A R, Merkel S, Tremper K, Naughton N. Depth of sedation in children undergoing computed tomography: validity and reliability of the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) Br J Anaesth. 2002;88(02):241–245. - PubMed
-
- Wolfe T R, Braude D A. Intranasal medication delivery for children: a brief review and update. Pediatrics. 2010;126(03):532–537. - PubMed
-
- Miller J L, Ashford J W, Archer S M, Rudy A C, Wermeling D P. Comparison of intranasal administration of haloperidol with intravenous and intramuscular administration: a pilot pharmacokinetic study. Pharmacotherapy. 2008;28(07):875–882. - PubMed
-
- Wermeling D P, Miller J L, Archer S M, Manaligod J M, Rudy A C. Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of lorazepam after intranasal, intravenous, and intramuscular administration. J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;41(11):1225–1231. - PubMed
-
- Veldhorst-Janssen N M, Fiddelers A A, van der Kuy P H, Neef C, Marcus M A. A review of the clinical pharmacokinetics of opioids, benzodiazepines, and antimigraine drugs delivered intranasally. Clin Ther. 2009;31(12):2954–2987. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
