The influence of BRCA variants of unknown significance on cancer risk management decision-making
- PMID: 31074248
- PMCID: PMC6543104
- DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e60
The influence of BRCA variants of unknown significance on cancer risk management decision-making
Abstract
Objective: To compare gynecological cancer risk management between women with BRCA variants of unknown significance (VUS) to women with negative genetic testing.
Methods: Ninety-nine patients whose BRCA genetic testing yielded VUS were matched with 99 control patients with definitive negative BRCA results at a single institution. Demographics and risk management decisions were obtained through chart review. Primary outcome was the rate of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO). Chi square tests, t-tests, and logistic regression were performed, with significance of p<0.05.
Results: VUS patients were more likely to be non-Caucasian (p=0.000) and of Ashkenazi-Jewish descent (p=0.000). There was no difference in gynecologic oncology referrals or recommendations to screen or undergo risk-reducing surgery for VUS vs. negative patients. Ultimately, 44 patients (22%) underwent RRBSO, with no significant difference in surgical rate based on the presence of VUS. Ashkenazi-Jewish descent was associated with a 4.5 times increased risk of RRBSO (OR=4.489; 95% CI=1.484-13.579) and family history of ovarian cancer was associated with a 2.6 times risk of RRBSO (OR=2.641; 95% CI=1.107-6.299).
Conclusion: In our institution, patients with VUS were surgically managed similarly to those with negative BRCA testing. The numbers of patients with VUS are likely to increase with the implementation of multi-gene panel testing. Our findings underscore the importance of genetic counseling and individualized screening and prevention strategies in the management of genetic testing results.
Keywords: Genetic Testing; Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome; Risk Assessment; Salpingo-oophorectomy.
Copyright © 2019. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Comment in
-
Clinical significance of variants of unknown significances in BRCA genes.J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jul;30(4):e80. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e80. Epub 2019 May 9. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31074233 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. Committee on Genetics Society of Gynecgologic Oncology: Practice Bulletin No 182: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:657–659. - PubMed
-
- Frank TS, Deffenbaugh AM, Reid JE, Hulick M, Ward BE, Lingenfelter B, et al. Clinical characteristics of individuals with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: analysis of 10,000 individuals. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1480–1490. - PubMed
-
- Murray ML, Cerrato F, Bennett RL, Jarvik GP. Follow-up of carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of unknown significance: variant reclassification and surgical decisions. Genet Med. 2011;13:998–1005. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
