Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;30(4):e60.
doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e60. Epub 2019 Feb 27.

The influence of BRCA variants of unknown significance on cancer risk management decision-making

Affiliations

The influence of BRCA variants of unknown significance on cancer risk management decision-making

Jing Yi Chern et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To compare gynecological cancer risk management between women with BRCA variants of unknown significance (VUS) to women with negative genetic testing.

Methods: Ninety-nine patients whose BRCA genetic testing yielded VUS were matched with 99 control patients with definitive negative BRCA results at a single institution. Demographics and risk management decisions were obtained through chart review. Primary outcome was the rate of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO). Chi square tests, t-tests, and logistic regression were performed, with significance of p<0.05.

Results: VUS patients were more likely to be non-Caucasian (p=0.000) and of Ashkenazi-Jewish descent (p=0.000). There was no difference in gynecologic oncology referrals or recommendations to screen or undergo risk-reducing surgery for VUS vs. negative patients. Ultimately, 44 patients (22%) underwent RRBSO, with no significant difference in surgical rate based on the presence of VUS. Ashkenazi-Jewish descent was associated with a 4.5 times increased risk of RRBSO (OR=4.489; 95% CI=1.484-13.579) and family history of ovarian cancer was associated with a 2.6 times risk of RRBSO (OR=2.641; 95% CI=1.107-6.299).

Conclusion: In our institution, patients with VUS were surgically managed similarly to those with negative BRCA testing. The numbers of patients with VUS are likely to increase with the implementation of multi-gene panel testing. Our findings underscore the importance of genetic counseling and individualized screening and prevention strategies in the management of genetic testing results.

Keywords: Genetic Testing; Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome; Risk Assessment; Salpingo-oophorectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials diagram of included patients.
VUS, variants of unknown significance; BSO, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

Comment in

References

    1. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. Committee on Genetics Society of Gynecgologic Oncology: Practice Bulletin No 182: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:657–659. - PubMed
    1. Frank TS, Deffenbaugh AM, Reid JE, Hulick M, Ward BE, Lingenfelter B, et al. Clinical characteristics of individuals with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: analysis of 10,000 individuals. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1480–1490. - PubMed
    1. Murray ML, Cerrato F, Bennett RL, Jarvik GP. Follow-up of carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of unknown significance: variant reclassification and surgical decisions. Genet Med. 2011;13:998–1005. - PubMed
    1. Calò V, Bruno L, La Paglia L, Perez M, Margarese N, Di Gaudio F, et al. The clinical significance of unknown sequence variants in BRCA genes. Cancers (Basel) 2010;2:1644–1660. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Culver JO, Brinkerhoff CD, Clague J, Yang K, Singh KE, Sand SR, et al. Variants of uncertain significance in BRCA testing: evaluation of surgical decisions, risk perception, and cancer distress. Clin Genet. 2013;84:464–472. - PMC - PubMed