Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;146(2):170-176.
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12859. Epub 2019 May 30.

A community-based, cross-sectional study of hrHPV DNA self-sampling-based cervical cancer screening in rural Karnataka, India

Affiliations

A community-based, cross-sectional study of hrHPV DNA self-sampling-based cervical cancer screening in rural Karnataka, India

Prajakta Adsul et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the feasibility of implementing a high-risk HPV (hrHPV) DNA-based screening program for cervical cancer and the prevalence of hrHPV DNA-positive women in a community setting in rural India.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the community level in the Hunsur taluk of the Mysore district from January to August 2016. Cervical cancer screening was conducted with self-collected vaginal samples that were analyzed using the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) assay (Qiagen, USA).

Results: The majority of participants were aged 30-39 years, with no formal schooling, from a lower caste, and lived below an annual household income of US$1499. After group health education and one-on-one counseling, a total of 473 women underwent self-sampling. Of these, 36 (7.6%) were positive for hrHPV and only 24 (66.6%) underwent follow-up diagnostic triaging. Cancer was detected in two women, who were referred to appropriate healthcare facilities for further treatment.

Conclusion: Implementation of hrHPV DNA-based screening tests using self-sampling can be feasible in rural settings in India. However, substantial resources are required for providing health education and one-on-one counseling to inform asymptomatic women about the benefits of testing and, more importantly, to improve compliance with follow-up.

Keywords: HPV DNA; Cervical cancer; Cross-sectional study; Demonstration study; Implementation; Screening; Self-sampling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Follow-up algorithm for cervical cancer screening

References

    1. Ferlay J, S. I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012;136(5):E359–86. International Journal of Cancer, 2014. - PubMed
    1. Gravitt PE and Rositch AF, HPV self-testing and cervical cancer screening coverage. The Lancet Oncology, 2014. 15(2): p. 128–129. - PubMed
    1. Ronco G, et al. , Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials. The Lancet. 2014;383(9916): p. 524–532. - PubMed
    1. Sankaranarayanan R, et al. , HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. New England Journal of Medicine, 2009. 360(14): p. 1385–1394. - PubMed
    1. Gakidou E, Nordhagen S, and Obermeyer Z, Coverage of cervical cancer screening in 57 countries: low average levels and large inequalities. PLoS Med, 2008. 5(6): p. e132. - PMC - PubMed