Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 10;5(5):CD004962.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004962.pub4.

Conservative management following closed reduction of traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder

Affiliations

Conservative management following closed reduction of traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder

Cordula Braun et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Acute anterior shoulder dislocation, which is the most common type of dislocation, usually results from an injury. Subsequently, the shoulder is less stable and is more susceptible to re-dislocation or recurrent instability (e.g. subluxation), especially in active young adults. After closed reduction, most of these injuries are treated with immobilisation of the injured arm in a sling or brace for a few weeks, followed by exercises. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2006 and last updated in 2014.

Objectives: To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of conservative interventions after closed reduction of traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder. These might include immobilisation, rehabilitative interventions or both.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PEDro and trial registries. We also searched conference proceedings and reference lists of included studies. Date of last search: May 2018.

Selection criteria: We included randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing conservative interventions with no treatment, a different intervention or a variant of the intervention (e.g. a different duration) for treating people after closed reduction of a primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. Inclusion was regardless of age, sex or mechanism of injury. Primary outcomes were re-dislocation, patient-reported shoulder instability measures and return to pre-injury activities. Secondary outcomes included participant satisfaction, health-related quality of life, any instability and adverse events.

Data collection and analysis: Both review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We pooled results of comparable groups of studies. We assessed risk of bias with the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool and the quality of the evidence with the GRADE approach.

Main results: We included seven trials (six randomised controlled trials and one quasi-randomised controlled trial) with 704 participants; three of these trials (234 participants) are new to this update. The mean age across the trials was 29 years (range 12 to 90 years), and 82% of the participants were male. All trials compared immobilisation in external rotation (with or without an additional abduction component) versus internal rotation (the traditional method) following closed reduction. No trial evaluated any other interventions or comparisons, such as rehabilitation. All trials provided data for a follow-up of one year or longer; the commonest length was two years or longer.All trials were at some risk of bias, commonly performance and detection biases given the lack of blinding. Two trials were at high risk of selection bias and some trials were affected by attrition bias for some outcomes. We rated the certainty of the evidence as very low for all outcomes.We are uncertain whether immobilisation in external rotation makes a difference to the risk of re-dislocation after 12 months' or longer follow-up compared with immobilisation in internal rotation (55/245 versus 73/243; risk ratio (RR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38 to 1.19; 488 participants; 6 studies; I² = 61%; very low certainty evidence). In a moderate-risk population with an illustrative risk of 312 per 1000 people experiencing a dislocation in the internal rotation group, this equates to 103 fewer (95% CI 194 fewer to 60 more) re-dislocations after immobilisation in external rotation. Thus this result covers the possibility of a benefit for each intervention.Individually, the four studies (380 participants) reporting on validated patient-reported outcome measures for shoulder instability at a minimum of 12 months' follow-up found no evidence of a clinically important difference between the two interventions.We are uncertain of the relative effects of the two methods of immobilisation on resumption of pre-injury activities or sports. One study (169 participants) found no evidence of a difference between interventions in the return to pre-injury activity of the affected arm. Two studies (135 participants) found greater return to sports in the external rotation group in a subgroup of participants who had sustained their injury during sports activities.None of the trials reported on participant satisfaction or health-related quality of life.We are uncertain whether there is a difference between the two interventions in the number of participants experiencing instability, defined as either re-dislocation or subluxation (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.14; 395 participants, 3 studies; very low certainty evidence).Data on adverse events were collected only in an ad hoc way in the seven studies. Reported "transient and resolved adverse events" were nine cases of shoulder stiffness or rigidity in the external rotation group and two cases of axillary rash in the internal rotation group. There were three "important" adverse events: hyperaesthesia and moderate hand pain; eighth cervical dermatome paraesthesia; and major movement restriction between 6 and 12 months. It was unclear to what extent these three events could be attributed to the treatment.

Authors' conclusions: The available evidence from randomised trials is limited to that comparing immobilisation in external versus internal rotation. Overall, the evidence is insufficient to draw firm conclusions about whether immobilisation in external rotation confers any benefit over immobilisation in internal rotation.Considering that there are several unpublished and ongoing trials evaluating immobilisation in external versus internal rotation, the main priority for research on this question consists of the publication of completed trials and the completion and publication of ongoing trials. Meanwhile, evaluation of other interventions, including rehabilitation, is warranted. There is a need for sufficiently large, good-quality, well-reported randomised controlled trials with long-term follow-up. Future research should aim to determine the optimal immobilisation duration, precise indications for immobilisation, optimal rehabilitation interventions, and the acceptability of these different interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Cordula Braun: none known Cliona McRobert: none known

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram for this update (2019)
2
2
Risk of bias graph: authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies
3
3
Risk of bias summary: authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study
4
4
Forest plot of Re‐dislocation at ≥ 12 months follow‐up (nearest to 24 months accepted)
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Immobilisation in external versus internal rotation, Outcome 1 Re‐dislocation at ≥ 12 months follow‐up (nearest to 24 months accepted).
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Immobilisation in external versus internal rotation, Outcome 3 Re‐dislocation, interim follow‐ups (3 and 12 months).
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Immobilisation in external versus internal rotation, Outcome 4 Re‐dislocation: stratified according to external rotation with / without abduction.
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Immobilisation in external versus internal rotation, Outcome 5 Validated patient‐reported outcome measures for shoulder disability (OSI, WOSI).
1.7
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 Immobilisation in external versus internal rotation, Outcome 7 Resumption of pre‐injury activities.
1.8
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 Immobilisation in external versus internal rotation, Outcome 8 Any instability (subluxation or subjective instability, individually or grouped into composite outcome).
1.9
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 Immobilisation in external versus internal rotation, Outcome 9 Adverse events.
1.10
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1 Immobilisation in external versus internal rotation, Outcome 10 Adherence to treatment.
1.11
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1 Immobilisation in external versus internal rotation, Outcome 11 Subsequent surgery.

Update of

Comment in

References

References to studies included in this review

Chan 2018 {published data only}
    1. Bentick K. Response to request for additional data [personal communication]. Email to: C Braun 1 September 2018.
    1. Chan SK, Bentick KR, Kuiper JH, Kelly CP. External rotation bracing for first‐time anterior dislocation of the shoulder: a discontinued randomised controlled trial comparing external rotation bracing with conventional sling. Shoulder & Elbow 2018 April 26 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI: ] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kelly CP, Smith HJ, Kuiper JH. External rotation bracing compared to conventional sling in first time anterior shoulder dislocation (abstract). Abstracts for the 22nd Annual Scientific Meeting, BESS,22–24 June 2011, Newcastle, UK; Shoulder & Elbow (on behalf of the British Shoulder and Elbow Society). 2011; Vol. 3, issue 4:273. [DOI: ]
    1. Kuiper JH, Smith HJ, Wales J, Kelly CP. External rotation bracing compared to conventional sling in first time anterior shoulder dislocation – The Shoulder Orthosis Study (SOS). Institute of Orthopaedics; Annual Report 2010/2011; www.orthopaedic‐institute.org/images/user/Institute%20Report%202011_Web.pdf (accessed 14 June 2013).
Finestone 2009 {published data only}
    1. Finestone A, Milgrom C, Radeva‐Petrova DR, Rath E, Barchilon V, Beyth S, et al. Bracing in external rotation for traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 2009;91(7):918‐21. - PubMed
    1. Milgrom C. Personal communication 5 October 2009.
Heidari 2014 {published data only}
    1. Heidari K, Asadollahi S, Vafaee R, Barfehei A, Kamalifar H, Chaboksavar ZA, et al. Immobilization in external rotation combined with abduction reduces the risk of recurrence after primary anterior shoulder dislocation. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 2014;23(6):759‐66. - PubMed
Itoi 2007 {published data only}
    1. Itoi E. Personal communication 8 April 2011.
    1. Itoi E. Personal communication July 2005.
    1. Itoi E, Hatakeyama Y, Sato T, Kido T, Minagawa H, Yamamoto N, et al. Immobilization in external rotation after dislocation of the shoulder reduces the risk of recurrence [platform presentation]. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting; 2007 Feb 14‐18; San Diego (CA). 2007.
    1. Itoi E, Hatakeyama Y, Sato T, Kido T, Minagawa H, Yamamoto N, et al. Immobilization in external rotation after shoulder dislocation reduces the risk of recurrence: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 2007;89(10):2124‐31. - PubMed
Liavaag 2011 {published data only}
    1. Liavaag S. Personal communication 21 April 2013.
    1. Liavaag S, Brox JI, Pripp AH, Enger M, Soldal LA, Svenningsen S. Immobilization in external rotation after primary shoulder dislocation did not reduce the risk of recurrence: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 2011;93(10):897‐904. - PubMed
    1. Liavaag S, Stiris MG, Lindland ES, Enger M, Svenningsen S, Brox JI. Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation? A randomized single‐blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI. Acta Orthopaedica 2009;80(5):579‐84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Svenningsen S. Does immobilization of the shoulder in external rotation reduce the recurrence rate of shoulder dislocation?. clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00202735 (accessed 12 November 2012).
Taskoparan 2010 {published data only}
    1. Taskoparan H, Kilincoglu V, Tunay S, Bilgic S, Yurttas Y, Komurcu M. Immobilization of the shoulder in external rotation for prevention of recurrence in acute anterior dislocation. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 2010;44(4):278‐84. - PubMed
Whelan 2014 {published data only}
    1. Litchfield RB. A randomized evaluation of immobilization in external rotation in the management of acute anterior dislocations of the shoulder. clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00196560 (accessed 12 November 2012).
    1. Whelan D, Litchfield RB, Boorman RS, Dainty K, Wambolt E, Chan DS, et al. A randomized evaluation of immobilization in external rotation after primary shoulder dislocation [abstract]. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 75th Annual Meeting; 2008 Mar 5‐9; San Francisco (CA). 2008.
    1. Whelan DB, Litchfield R, Wambolt E, Dainty KN, Joint Orthopaedic Initiative for National Trials of the Shoulder (JOINTS). External rotation immobilization for primary shoulder dislocation: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2014;472(8):2380‐6. - PMC - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

ACTRN12611001183976 {unpublished data only}
    1. Walker T. Personal communication 13 November 2012.
    1. Walker T. A randomised controlled trial on the effect of physiotherapy and an external rotation brace on redislocation rate and shoulder function in patients aged 15‐40 years with a first time anterior shoulder dislocation. who.int/trialsearch/Trial.aspx?TrialID=ACTRN12611001183976 (accessed 12 November 2012).
    1. Walker T. Status of ACTRN12611001183976 "A randomised controlled trial on the effect of physiotherapy and an external rotation brace in the management of first time anterior shoulder dislocations in patients aged 15‐40 years." [personal communication]. Email to: C Braun 4 June 2018.
Blanchard 2015 {published data only}
    1. Blanchard D, Bourgeois S. Conservative management following closed reduction of a traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Orthopedic Nursing 2015;34(4):243‐4. - PubMed
Chutkan 2012 {published data only}
    1. Chutkan NB. Immobilization in external rotation after primary shoulder dislocation did not reduce the risk of recurrence: a randomized controlled trial. Orthopedics 2012;35(7):610‐1. - PubMed
Harper 2000 {unpublished data only}
    1. Harper W. Anterior shoulder dislocations in the over 45 years of age. a prospective randomised study. In: National Resarch Register, Issue 1, 2005. Oxford: Update Software. www.nrr.nhs.uk/ViewDocument.asp?ID=N0122017162 (accessed 12 May 2005).
Hovelius 1983 {published data only}
    1. Arciero RA, Taylor DC. Primary anterior dislocation of the shoulder in young patients. A ten‐year prospective study [letter]. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 1998;80(2):299‐300. - PubMed
    1. Hovelius L. Anterior dislocation of the shoulder in teenagers and young adults. Five year prognosis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 1987;69(3):393‐9. - PubMed
    1. Hovelius L. The natural history of primary anterior dislocation of the shoulder in the young. Journal of Orthopaedic Science 1999;4(4):307‐17. - PubMed
    1. Hovelius L, Augustini BG, Fredin H, Johansson O, Norlin R, Thorling J. Primary anterior dislocation of the shoulder in young patients. A ten‐year prospective study. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 1996;78(11):1677‐84. - PubMed
    1. Hovelius L, Eriksson K, Fredin H, Hagberg G, Hussenius A, Lind B, et al. Recurrences after initial dislocation of the shoulder. Results of a prospective study of treatment. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 1983;65(3):343‐9. - PubMed
Hutchinson 2013 {published data only}
    1. Hutchinson M. Shoulder Instability: A Comprehensive Approach. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 2013;45(1):216.
Itoi 2003 {published data only}
    1. Itoi E. Personal communication 10 July 2005.
    1. Itoi E, Hatakeyama Y, Kido T, Sato T, Minagawa H, Wakabayashi I, et al. A new method of immobilization after traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder: a preliminary study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 2003;12(5):413‐5. - PubMed
    1. Itoi E, Hatakeyama Y, Kido T, Sato T, Minagawa H, Wakabayashi I, et al. A new method of immobilization in dislocation of the shoulder: a prospective randomized study [abstract]. Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2003 February 5‐9; New Orleans [LA]. www.aaos.org/wordhtml/anmt2003/sciprog/200.htm (accessed 01 October 2003).
    1. Itoi E, Hatakeyama Y, Sato T, Kido T, Minagawa H, Wakabayashi I, et al. Immobilization in external rotation after shoulder dislocation: an interim report of an ongoing trial [abstract]. Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2004 March 10‐14; San Francisco (CA). www.aaos.org/wordhtml/anmt2004/sciprog/071.htm (accessed 07 April 2004).
Itoi 2015 {published data only}
    1. Itoi E, Kitamura T, Hitachi S, Hatta T, Yamamoto N, Sano H. Arm abduction provides a better reduction of the Bankart lesion during immobilization in external rotation after an initial shoulder dislocation. American Journal of Sports Medicine 2015;43(7):1731‐6. - PubMed
Kiviluoto 1980 {published data only}
    1. Kiviluoto O, Pasila M, Jaroma H, Sundholm A. Immobilization after primary dislocation of the shoulder. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 1980;51(6):915‐9. - PubMed
Königshausen 2014 {published data only}
    1. Königshausen M, Schliemann B, Schildhauer TA, Seybold D. Evaluation of immobilization in external rotation after primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: 5‐year results. Musculoskeletal Surgery 2014;98(2):143‐51. - PubMed
Lacy 2015 {published data only}
    1. Lacy K, Cooke C, Cooke P, Schupbach J, Vaidya R. Low‐cost alternative external rotation shoulder brace and review of treatment in acute shoulder dislocations. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 2015;16(1):114‐20. - PMC - PubMed
McCarty 2014 {published data only}
    1. McCarty EC. Immobilization with an external rotation brace was similar to an internal rotation sling for shoulder dislocation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 2014;96(16):1398. - PubMed
Momenzadeh 2015 {published data only}
    1. Momenzadeh OR, Pourmokhtari M, Sefidbakht S, Vosoughi AR. Does the position of shoulder immobilization after reduced anterior glenohumeral dislocation affect coaptation of a Bankart lesion? An arthrographic comparison. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2015;16(4):317‐21. - PMC - PubMed
Staply 2002 {unpublished data only}
    1. Luya M. Personal communication 6 June 2005.
    1. Staply S. Anterior shoulder trial dislocation external rotation trial. In: National Resarch Register, Issue 1, 2005. Oxford: Update Software. www.nrr.nhs.uk/ViewDocument.asp?ID=N0284109750 (accessed 12 May 2005).
Wakefield 2001 {unpublished data only}
    1. Wakefield A. Personal communication 24 June 2005.
    1. Wakefield A. The role of physiotherapy in the prevention of recurrence of anterior shoulder dislocation. In: National Research Register, Issue 1, 2005. Oxford: Update Software. www.nrr.nhs.uk/ViewDocument.asp?ID=N0519070803 (accessed 12 May 2005).
Whelan 2010 {published data only}
    1. Whelan D. Immobilization in an external or internal rotation brace did not differ in preventing recurrent shoulder dislocation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 2010;92(5):1262. - PubMed
Xu 2003 {published data only}
    1. Xu Q, Gong Y, Lan Z, Xue C. Effects of systematic rehabilitation treatment on the stability of shoulder in young patients with shoulder dislocation. Zhongguo Linchuang Kangfu [Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation] 2003;14(7):2050‐1.

References to studies awaiting assessment

ISRCTN41070054 {unpublished data only}
    1. Nicolaou N. Splintage in external rotation for anterior glenohumeral dislocation: a prospective randomised and controlled study. apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial.aspx?TrialID=ISRCTN41070054 (accessed 12 November 2012).
ISRCTN48254181 {unpublished data only}
    1. Pimpalnerker A. A comparison study of internal versus external rotation immobilisation for primary anterior shoulder dislocation. apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial.aspx?TrialID=ISRCTN48254181 (accessed 12 November 2012).
Itoi 2013 {published data only}
    1. Itoi E, Hatakeyama Y, Itoigawa Y, Omi R, Shinozaki N, Yamamoto N, et al. Is protecting the healing ligament beneficial after immobilization in external rotation for an initial shoulder dislocation?. American Journal of Sports Medicine 2013;41(5):1126‐32. - PubMed
Miller 2007 {published data only}
    1. Miller BS, Cole EM, Sonnabend D, Kaar SG. Sling vs external rotation brace for shoulder dislocations: preliminary results of a randomized trial [poster presentation]. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting; 2007 Feb 14‐18; San Diego (CA) 2007.
Murray 2016 {published data only}
    1. Murray JC. Re: Enquiry on the availability of a full study report [personal communication]. Email to: C Braun 31 May 2018.
    1. Murray JC, Leclerc A, Pelet S. Immobilisation in external rotation after primary shoulder dislocation reduces the risk of recurrence in young patients: a randomised controlled trial. Bone & Joint Journal Orthopaedic Proceedings 2016;98_B(Supp 20):77. - PubMed
    1. Pelet S. Personal communication 21 January 2013.
    1. Pelet S, Cote H. First time anterior glenohumeral joint dislocation with a Bankart lesion in young patients: which type of immobilization should be chosen? A prospective randomized study. apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial.aspx?TrialID=NCT01111500 (accessed 12 November 2012).
NCT00707018 {unpublished data only}
    1. McCarty E. Immobilization in external rotation after first time anterior shoulder dislocation: a prospective randomized study. apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial.aspx?TrialID=NCT00707018 (accessed 12 November 2012).

References to ongoing studies

ACTRN12616001241426 {published data only}
    1. ACTRN12616001241426. An RCT assessing the efficacy of smart phone apps in the conservative management of shoulder rehabilitation post dislocation in the male and female population between 15‐60 years of age. apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=ACTRN12616001241426 (accessed 07 November 2018).
    1. Noye N. Re: Enquiry on your registered trial ACTRN12616001241426 [personal communication]. Email to: C. Braun 25 May 2018.
ARTISAN {published data only}
    1. ARTISAN Trial. Acute rehabilitation following traumatic anterior shoulder dISlocAtioN (ARTISAN) ‐ A Multi Centre RCT. Health Technology Assessment Research Projects: journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hta/1616756/#/ (accessed 07 November 2018) 2018. [ISRCTN 63184243]
    1. Shah A. Acute rehabilitation following traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN63184243 (first received 3 September 2018).
Eshoj 2017 {published data only}
    1. Eshoj H. A neuromuscular exercise program for patients with anterior shoulder instability (SINEX). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02371928 (first received 26 February 2015).
    1. Eshoj H, Rasmussen S, Frich LH, Hvass I, Christensen R, Jensen SL, et al. A neuromuscular exercise programme versus standard care for patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the SINEX study). Trials 2017;18(1):90. - PMC - PubMed
NCT01648335 {published data only}
    1. NCT01648335. A prospective study of the effect of treatment of first time traumatic shoulder anterior dislocation by immobilization in external rotation on the incidence of recurrent dislocation. apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial.aspx?TrialID=NCT01648335 (accessed 1 November 2012).
NCT02197819 {published data only}
    1. NCT02197819. A randomized evaluation of emergent immobilization in External Rotation in the Management of Acute Anterior Dislocations of the Shoulder (EERAADS). apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NCT02197819 (accessed 07 November 2018).

Additional references

Angst 2011
    1. Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Aeschlimann A, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J. Measures of adult shoulder function disabilities. Arthritis Care & Research 2011;63(S11):S174‐88. [DOI: ] - PubMed
Balke 2016
    1. Balke M, Shafizadeh S, Bouillon B, Banerjee M. Management of shoulder instability: the current state of treatment among German orthopaedic surgeons. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2016;136(12):1717‐21. - PubMed
Bankart 1938
    1. Bankart AS. The pathology and treatment of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder joint. British Journal of Surgery 1938;26(101):23‐9.
Berendes 2015
    1. Berendes TD, Pilot P, Nagels J, Vochteloo AJ, Nelissen RG. Survey on the management of acute first‐time anterior shoulder dislocation amongst Dutch public hospitals. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2015;135(4):447‐54. - PMC - PubMed
Cameron 2017
    1. Cameron KL, Mauntel TC, Owens BD. The epidemiology of glenohumeral joint instability: incidence, burden, and long‐term consequences. Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review 2017;25(3):144‐9. - PubMed
Dawson 1999
    1. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. The assessment of shoulder instability. The development and validation of a questionnaire. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 1999;81(3):420–6. - PubMed
de Boer 2005
    1. Boer P. Personal communication 21 October 2005.
Demehri 2017
    1. Demehri S, Hafezi‐Nejad N, Fishman EK. Advanced imaging of glenohumeral instability: the role of MRI and MDCT in providing what clinicians need to know. Emergency Radiology 2017;24(1):95‐103. - PubMed
Dymond 2011
    1. Dymond C, Stone R, Furyk J, Seymour J. Conservative management for traumatic shoulder dislocations: is external rotation clinically effective?. EMA ‐ Emergency Medicine Australasia. Conference: 27th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine Canberra, ACT Australia 2011;23:28.
Forsythe 2015
    1. Forsythe B, Frank RM, Ahmed M, Verma NN, Cole BJ, Romeo AA, et al. Identification and treatment of existing copathology in anterior shoulder instability repair. Arthroscopy 2015;31(1):154‐66. - PubMed
Handoll 2004
    1. Handoll HHG, Almaiyah MA. Surgical versus non‐surgical treatment for acute anterior shoulder dislocation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004325.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557‐60. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JP, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Hill 1940
    1. Hill HA, Sachs MD. The grooved defect of the humeral head: a frequently unrecognised complication of dislocations of the shoulder joint. Radiology 1940;35:690‐700.
Hovelius 2008
    1. Hovelius L, Olofsson A, Sandstrom B, Augustini BG, Krantz L, Fredin H, et al. Nonoperative treatment of primary anterior shoulder dislocation in patients forty years of age and younger. A prospective twenty‐five‐year follow‐up. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 2008;90:945‐52. - PubMed
Itoi 1999
    1. Itoi E, Hatakeyama Y, Urayama M, Pradhan R L, Kido T, Sato K. Position of immobilization after dislocation of the shoulder. A cadaveric study. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 1999;81(3):385‐90. - PubMed
Itoi 2001
    1. Itoi E, Sashi R, Minagawa H, Shinizu T, Wakabayashi I, Sato K. Position of immobilization after dislocation of the glenohumeral joint. A study with use of magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 2001;83(5):661‐7. - PubMed
Karatsolis 2006
    1. Karatsolis K, Athanasopoulos S. The role of exercise in the conservative treatment of the anterior shoulder dislocation. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 2006;10(3):211‐9.
Kavaja 2018
    1. Kavaja L, Lähdeoja T, Malmivaara A, Paavola M. Treatment after traumatic shoulder dislocation: A systematic review with a network meta‐analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2018;52:1498‐506. - PMC - PubMed
Kirkley 1998
    1. Kirkley A, Griffin S, McLintock H, Ng L. The development and evaluation of a disease‐specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). American Journal of Sports Medicine 1998;6:764–72. - PubMed
Kitamura 2005
    1. Kitamura T, Ikuta T. Immobilization with external rotation position after labrum injuries in young patients: repositioning of labrums observed by MRA. Shoulder Joint 2005;29(3):519‐22.
Lefebvre 2011
    1. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Liavaag 2009
    1. Liavaag S, Stiris MG, Lindland ES, Enger M, Svenningsen S, Brox JI. Do Bankart lesions heal better in shoulders immobilized in external rotation? A randomized single‐blind study of 55 patients examined with MRI. Acta Orthopaedica 2009;80(5):579‐84. - PMC - PubMed
Liu 2014
    1. Liu A, Xue X, Chen Y, Bi F, Yan S. The external rotation immobilisation does not reduce recurrence rates or improve quality of life after primary anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Injury 2014;45(12):1842‐7. - PubMed
Longo 2014
    1. Longo UG, Loppini M, Rizzello G, Ciuffreda M, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Management of primary acute anterior shoulder dislocation: systematic review and quantitative synthesis of the literature. Arthroscopy ‐ Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 2014;30(4):506‐22. - PubMed
Miller 2004
    1. Miller BS, Sonnabend DH, Hatrick C, O'Leary S, Goldberg J, Harper W, et al. Should acute anterior dislocations of the shoulder be immobilized in external rotation? A cadaveric study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 2004;13:589‐92. - PubMed
Moxon 2010
    1. Moxon AP, Walker T, Rando A. External rotation brace combined with a physiotherapy program for first time anterior shoulder dislocators: a 2 year follow‐up. Australasian Medical Journal 2010;1(4):253‐8.
Murad 2017
    1. Murad MH, Mustafa RA, Schünemann HJ, Sultan S, Santesso N. Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect. BMJ Evidence‐Based Medicine 2017;22(3):85‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Murray 2013
    1. Murray IR, Ahmed I, White NJ, Robinson CM. Traumatic anterior shoulder instability in the athlete. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports 2013;23(4):387‐405. - PubMed
Murray 2018
    1. Murray JC, Leclerc A, Balatri A, Pelet S. Immobilization in external rotation after primary shoulder dislocation reduces the risk of recurrence in young patients. A randomized controlled trial. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 2018 Nov 27 [Epub ahead of print]. [doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.10.007] - PubMed
O'Brien 1987
    1. O'Brien SJ, Warren RF, Schwartz EA. Anterior shoulder instability. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 1987;18(3):395‐408. - PubMed
Olds 2015
    1. Olds M, Ellis R, Donaldson K, Parmar P, Kersten P. Risk factors which predispose first‐time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations to recurrent instability in adults: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2015;49(14):913‐22. - PMC - PubMed
Paterson 2010
    1. Paterson WH, Throckmorton TW, Koester M, Azar FM, Kuhn JE. Position and duration of immobilization after primary anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the literature. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 2010;92(18):2924‐33. - PubMed
Pennekamp 2006
    1. Pennekamp W, Gekle C, Nicolas V, Seybold D. Initial results of shoulder MRI in external rotation after primary shoulder dislocation and after immobilization in external rotation [Initiale ergebnisse der schulter‐MRT in ausenrotation bei primarer schulterluxation und nach ruhigstellung in ausenrotation]. RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren 2006;178(4):410‐5. - PubMed
Rhee 2009
    1. Rhee YG, Cho NS, Cho SH. Traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder: factors affecting the progress of the traumatic anterior dislocation. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2009;1(4):188‐93. - PMC - PubMed
Robinson 2006
    1. Robinson CM, Howes J, Murdoch H, Will E, Graham C. Functional outcome and risk of recurrent instability after primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in young patients. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 2006;88(11):2326‐36. - PubMed
Robinson 2012
    1. Robinson CM, Seah KTM, Chee YH, Hindle P, Murray IR. Frozen shoulder. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 2012;94(1):1‐9. - PubMed
Schunemann 2011
    1. Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Glaziou P, et al. Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Seybold 2009
    1. Seybold D, Schliemann B, Heyer CM, Muhr G, Gekle C. Which labral lesion can be best reduced with external rotation of the shoulder after a first‐time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation?. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2009;129(3):299‐304. - PubMed
Siegler 2010
    1. Siegler J, Proust J, Marcheix PSM, Charissoux JL, Mabit C, Arnaud JP. Is external rotation the correct immobilisation for acute shoulder dislocation? An MRI study. Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research 2010;96(4):329‐33. - PubMed
Sullivan 2007
    1. Sullivan LG, Bailie R, Weiss N, Miller BS. An evaluation of shoulder external rotation braces. Arthroscopy 2007;23(2):129‐34. - PubMed
van der Linde 2015
    1. Linde JA, Kampen DA, Beers LW, Deurzen DF, Terwee CB, Willems WJ. The Oxford Shoulder Instability Score; validation in Dutch and first‐time assessment of its smallest detectable change. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2015;10(1):1‐8. - PMC - PubMed
van der Linde 2017
    1. Linde JA, Kampen DA, Beers LW, Deurzen DF, Saris DB, Terwee CB. The responsiveness and minimal important change of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index and Oxford Shoulder Instability Score. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 2017;47(6):402‐10. - PubMed
Vavken 2014
    1. Vavken P, Sadoghi P, Quidde J, Lucas R, Delaney R, Mueller AM, et al. Immobilization in internal or external rotation does not change recurrence rates after traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 2014;23(1):13‐9. - PubMed
Wasserstein 2016
    1. Wasserstein DN, Sheth U, Colbenson K, Henry PD, Chahal J, Dwyer T, Kuhn JE. The true recurrence rate and factors predicting recurrent instability after nonsurgical management of traumatic primary anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 2016;32(12):2616‐25. [DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.039] - DOI - PubMed
Whelan 2016
    1. Whelan DB, Kletke SN, Schemitsch G, Chahal J. Immobilization in external rotation versus internal rotation after primary anterior shoulder dislocation. American Journal of Sports Medicine 2016;44(2):521‐32. - PubMed
Zacchilli 2010
    1. Zacchilli MA, Owens Brett D. Epidemiology of shoulder dislocations presenting to emergency departments in the United States. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery ‐ American Volume 2010;92(3):542‐9. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Hanchard 2014
    1. Hanchard NC, Goodchild LM, Kottam L. Conservative management following closed reduction of traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004962.pub3] - DOI - PubMed
Handoll 2006
    1. Handoll HHG, Hanchard NCA, Goodchild LM, Feary J. Conservative management following closed reduction of traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004962.pub2] - DOI - PubMed

Publication types