Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 9;9(5):e026514.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026514.

Patient and public involvement in health research in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Natalie Cook  1   2 , Najma Siddiqi  1   2   3 , Maureen Twiddy  4   5 , Richard Kenyon  6
Affiliations

Patient and public involvement in health research in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Natalie Cook et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is argued to lead to higher quality health research, which is more relatable to and helps empower the public. We synthesised the evidence to look for examples of PPI in health research in low/middle-income countries (LMICs), looking at levels of involvement and impact. Additionally, we considered the impact of who was undertaking the research on the level of involvement and reported impact.

Design: Systematic review.

Data sources: EMBASE, Medline and PsychINFO, along with hand-searching references, grey literature, Google search and expert advice.

Eligibility criteria: Any health research with evidence of patient or public involvement, with no language restrictions dated from 1978 to 1 Dec 2017.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data relating to stage and level of involvement, as well as impact, were extracted by one researcher (NC), and a coding framework was developed using an inductive approach to examine the impact of PPI on research. Extracted data were then independently coded by a second lay researcher (RK) to validate the data being collected. Discrepancies were referred to a third independent reviewer (MT) for review and consensus reached.

Results: Sixty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. The review revealed the most common stage for PPI was in research planning, and the most common level of involvement was collaboration. Most studies did not provide evidence of effectiveness or elaborate on the impact of PPI, and they tended to report impact from the researcher's perspective. Where impact was mentioned, this generally related to increased relevance to the community, empowerment of participants and alterations in study design.

Conclusions: The literature describing approaches to and impact of PPI on LMIC health research is sparse. As PPI is essential to conducting high-quality research, it should be fully reported and evaluated at the end of the research project.

Keywords: international health services; qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
National Institute for Health Research research cycle.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Exclusion criteria. LMIC, low/middle-income country; PPI, patient and public involvement.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. INVOLVE. Frequently asked questions. 2018. http://www.invo.org.uk/frequently-asked-questions/ (Accessed 12 Jun 2018).
    1. World Health Organisation. Declaration of Alma Ata: report of the International Conference on Primary Health Care. Geneva, 1978.
    1. Lemonsky F. Service user involvement in research. Lancet Psychiatry 2015;2:780 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00365-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research involving Human Subjects. 2008. - PubMed
    1. Semrau M, Lempp H, Keynejad R, et al. . Service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:79 10.1186/s12913-016-1323-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types