Vitamin D status in the United States, 2011-2014
- PMID: 31076739
- PMCID: PMC7263437
- DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz037
Vitamin D status in the United States, 2011-2014
Abstract
Background: Vitamin D is important for bone health; in 2014 it was the fifth most commonly ordered laboratory test among Medicare Part B payments.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe vitamin D status in the US population in 2011-2014 and trends from 2003 to 2014.
Methods: We used serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D data from NHANES 2011-2014 (n = 16,180), and estimated the prevalence at risk of deficiency (<30 nmol/L) or prevalence at risk of inadequacy (30-49 nmol/L) by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin, and dietary intake of vitamin D. We also present trends between 2003 and 2014.
Results: In 2011-2014, the percentage aged ≥1 y at risk of vitamin D deficiency or inadequacy was 5.0% (95% CI: 4.1%, 6.2%) and 18.3% (95% CI: 16.2%, 20.6%). The prevalence of at risk of deficiency was lowest among children aged 1-5 y (0.5%; 95% CI: 0.3%, 1.1%), peaked among adults aged 20-39 y (7.6%; 95% CI: 6.0%, 9.6%), and fell to 2.9% (95% CI: 2.0%, 4.0%) among adults aged ≥60 y; the prevalence of at risk of inadequacy was similar. The prevalence of at risk of deficiency was higher among non-Hispanic black (17.5%; 95% CI: 15.2%, 20.0%) than among non-Hispanic Asian (7.6%; 95% CI: 5.9%, 9.9%), non-Hispanic white (2.1%; 95% CI: 1.5%, 2.7%), and Hispanic (5.9%; 95% CI: 4.4%, 7.8%) persons; the prevalence of at risk of inadequacy was similar. Persons with higher vitamin D dietary intake or who used supplements had lower prevalences of at risk of deficiency or inadequacy. From 2003 to 2014 there was no change in the risk of vitamin D deficiency; the risk of inadequacy declined from 21.0% (95% CI: 17.9%, 24.5%) to 17.7% (95% CI: 16.0%, 19.7%).
Conclusion: The prevalence of at risk of vitamin D deficiency in the United States remained stable from 2003 to 2014; at risk of inadequacy declined. Differences in vitamin D status by race and Hispanic origin warrant additional investigation.
Keywords: 25(OH)D; NHANES; diet; supplements; survey; trend; vitamin D status.
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2019.
Figures

Comment in
-
Monitoring vitamin D status and intake in the US population: essential to understanding the role of vitamin D in health.Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Jul 1;110(1):6-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz069. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019. PMID: 31075791 No abstract available.
References
-
- Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General Medicare payments for clinical laboratory tests in 2014: baseline data [Internet]. Available from: https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-09-15-00210.pdf (cited June 28, 2018).
-
- Lin KW. Vitamin D screening and supplementation in primary care: time to curb our enthusiasm. Am Fam Physician. 2018;97(4):226–7. - PubMed
-
- Dwyer JT, Woteki C, Bailey R, Britten P, Carriquiry A, Gaine PC, Miller D, Moshfegh A, Murphy MM, Smith Edge M. Fortification: new findings and implications. Nutr Rev. 2014;72(2):127–41. - PubMed
-
- Newberry SJ CM, Shekelle PG, Booth MS, Liu JL, Maher AR, Motala A, Cui M, Perry T, Shanman R, Balk EM. Vitamin D and Calcium: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes (update). Evidence Report/technology Assessment no. 217. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical