Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Sep;40(13):3712-3737.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.24627. Epub 2019 May 11.

Neural processing of social interaction: Coordinate-based meta-analytic evidence from human neuroimaging studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Neural processing of social interaction: Coordinate-based meta-analytic evidence from human neuroimaging studies

Maria Arioli et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

While the action observation and mentalizing networks are considered to play complementary roles in understanding others' goals and intentions, they might be concurrently engaged when processing social interactions. We assessed this hypothesis via three activation-likelihood-estimation meta-analyses of neuroimaging studies on the neural processing of: (a) social interactions, (b) individual actions by the action observation network, and (c) mental states by the mentalizing network. Conjunction analyses and direct comparisons unveiled overlapping and specific regions among the resulting maps. We report quantitative meta-analytic evidence for a "social interaction network" including key nodes of the action observation and mentalizing networks. An action-social interaction-mentalizing gradient of activity along the posterior temporal cortex highlighted a hierarchical processing of interactions, from visuomotor analyses decoding individual and shared intentions to in-depth inferences on actors' intentional states. The medial prefrontal cortex, possibly in conjunction with the amygdala, might provide additional information concerning the affective valence of the interaction. This evidence suggests that the functional architecture underlying the neural processing of interactions involves the joint involvement of the action observation and mentalizing networks. These data might inform the design of rehabilitative treatments for social cognition disorders in pathological conditions, and the assessment of their outcome in randomized controlled trials.

Keywords: action observation network; activation likelihood estimation; amygdala network; mentalizing network; meta-analysis; mirror network; social cognition rehabilitation; social interaction network.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Action observation, mentalizing, and social interaction brain networks. From top to bottom, the figure reports the brain structures consistently associated with processing others' individual actions (action observation network, red), others' mental states (theory of mind [ToM], or mentalizing, network, blue) and social interactions (interaction network, green), either in isolation or superimposed onto the same brain render and slices. All the reported activations survived a statistical threshold of p < .05 corrected for multiple comparisons. A = action observation; I = interaction; T = theory of mind (mentalizing)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Commonalities and differences across action observation, mentalizing, and social interaction brain networks. From top to bottom, the figure depicts with different colors the common and specific brain structures across the action observation and mentalizing networks (a), action observation and interaction networks (b), as well as mentalizing and interaction networks (c). In the bottom panel, the three networks are depicted onto the same brain render alongside the common voxels across the interaction network and either the action observation (yellow) or mentalizing (cyan) networks. All the reported activations survived a statistical threshold of p < .05 corrected for multiple comparisons. A = action observation; I = interaction; T = theory of mind (mentalizing)

References

    1. Abraham, A. , Rakoczy, H. , Werning, M. , von Cramon, D. Y. , & Schubotz, R. I. (2010). Matching mind to world and vice versa: Functional dissociations between belief and desire mental state processing. Social Neuroscience, 5, 1–18. - PubMed
    1. Adolphs, R. (2010). What does the amygdala contribute to social cognition? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 42–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agnew, Z. , & Wise, R. J. (2008). Separate areas for mirror responses and agency within the parietal operculum. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 12268–12273. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aichhorn, M. , Perner, J. , Weiss, B. , Kronbichler, M. , Staffen, W. , & Ladurner, G. (2009). Temporo‐parietal junction activity in theory‐of‐mind tasks: Falseness, beliefs, or attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1179–1192. - PubMed
    1. Akitsuki, Y. , & Decety, J. (2009). Social context and perceived agency affects empathy for pain: An event‐related fMRI investigation. NeuroImage, 47, 722–734. - PubMed

Publication types