Methods for exploring and eliciting patient preferences in the medical product lifecycle: a literature review
- PMID: 31077814
- DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.05.001
Methods for exploring and eliciting patient preferences in the medical product lifecycle: a literature review
Abstract
Preference studies are becoming increasingly important within the medical product decision-making context. Currently, there is limited understanding of the range of methods to gain insights into patient preferences. We developed a compendium and taxonomy of preference exploration (qualitative) and elicitation (quantitative) methods by conducting a systematic literature review to identify these methods. This review was followed by analyzing prior preference method reviews, to cross-validate our results, and consulting intercontinental experts, to confirm our outcomes. This resulted in the identification of 32 unique preference methods. The developed compendium and taxonomy can serve as an important resource for assessing these methods and helping to determine which are most appropriate for different research questions at varying points in the medical product lifecycle.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Appraising patient preference methods for decision-making in the medical product lifecycle: an empirical comparison.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01142-w. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020. PMID: 32560655 Free PMC article.
-
Eliciting Preferences in Dentistry with Multiattribute Stated Preference Methods: A Systematic Review.JDR Clin Trans Res. 2018 Oct;3(4):326-335. doi: 10.1177/2380084418780324. Epub 2018 Jun 1. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2018. PMID: 30931788
-
Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(5):1-186. doi: 10.3310/hta5050. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11262422
-
Factors and situations influencing the value of patient preference studies along the medical product lifecycle: a literature review.Drug Discov Today. 2019 Jan;24(1):57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.09.015. Epub 2018 Sep 26. Drug Discov Today. 2019. PMID: 30266656
-
Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for medical interventions: an overview of a growing empirical literature.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Aug;11(4):319-29. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0028-y. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013. PMID: 23637054 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient Preferences for Biologic and Biosimilar Osteoporosis Treatments in Colombia.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Jun 23;14:1049-1064. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S250745. eCollection 2020. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020. PMID: 32612354 Free PMC article.
-
Virtual Service Delivery in Mental Health and Substance Use Care: A Systematic Review of Preference Elicitation Studies.Community Ment Health J. 2025 Apr;61(3):440-461. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01350-y. Epub 2024 Sep 13. Community Ment Health J. 2025. PMID: 39269570 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Stated Preference Methods in HIV Treatment and Prevention Research in the United States: A Systematic Review.AIDS Behav. 2023 Jul;27(7):2328-2359. doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03962-5. Epub 2023 Feb 21. AIDS Behav. 2023. PMID: 36809490
-
Young Adult and Parent Willingness to Pay for Meningococcal Serogroup B Vaccination.MDM Policy Pract. 2024 Aug 12;9(2):23814683241264280. doi: 10.1177/23814683241264280. eCollection 2024 Jul-Dec. MDM Policy Pract. 2024. PMID: 39139368 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing Outcomes of a Discrete Choice Experiment and Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling: An Application to Neuromuscular Disease Treatment.Patient. 2023 May;16(3):239-253. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00615-0. Epub 2023 Feb 13. Patient. 2023. PMID: 36781628 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources