Time to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Results from a prospective multicentre trainee-led audit
- PMID: 31080604
- PMCID: PMC6498807
- DOI: 10.1177/2050640618811491
Time to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Results from a prospective multicentre trainee-led audit
Abstract
Background: Endoscopy within 24 h of admission (early endoscopy) is a quality standard in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB). We aimed to audit time to endoscopy outcomes and identify factors affecting delayed endoscopy (>24 h of admission).
Methods: This prospective multicentre audit enrolled patients admitted with AUGIB who underwent inpatient endoscopy between November and December 2017. Analyses were performed to identify factors associated with delayed endoscopy, and to compare patient outcomes, including length of stay and mortality rates, between early and delayed endoscopy groups.
Results: Across 348 patients from 20 centres, the median time to endoscopy was 21.2 h (IQR 12.0-35.7), comprising median admission to referral and referral to endoscopy times of 8.1 h (IQR 3.7-18.1) and 6.7 h (IQR 3.0-23.1), respectively. Early endoscopy was achieved in 58.9%, although this varied by centre (range: 31.0-87.5%, p = 0.002). On multivariable analysis, lower Glasgow-Blatchford score, delayed referral, admissions between 7:00 and 19:00 hours or via the emergency department were independent predictors of delayed endoscopy. Early endoscopy was associated with reduced length of stay (median difference 1 d; p = 0.004), but not 30-d mortality (p = 0.344).
Conclusions: The majority of centres did not meet national standards for time to endoscopy. Strategic initiatives involving acute care services may be necessary to improve this outcome.
Keywords: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding; endoscopy; haemorrhage; quality; time to endoscopy.
Figures



Comment in
-
A call to arms for change: The UK strategy to improve standards of care in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Apr;7(3):449-450. doi: 10.1177/2050640619828216. Epub 2019 Feb 2. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019. PMID: 31019713 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Timing of endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in North West England: Results from a multicentre trainee-led network.United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Apr;7(3):451-452. doi: 10.1177/2050640619828214. Epub 2019 Feb 2. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019. PMID: 31019714 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Button LA, Roberts SE, Evans PA, et al. Hospitalized incidence and case fatality for upper gastrointestinal bleeding from 1999 to 2007: a record linkage study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33(1): 64–76. - PubMed
-
- NICE. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in over 16s: management. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg141. (2012, accessed 20 February 2018).
-
- SIGN. Management of acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Available from: http://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign105.pdf (2008, accessed 20 February 2018).
-
- Gralnek IM, Dumonceau JM, Kuipers EJ, et al. Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2015; 47(10): a1–46. - PubMed
-
- Hearnshaw SA, Logan RF, Lowe D, et al. Use of endoscopy for management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: results of a nationwide audit. Gut 2010; 59(8): 1022–1029. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical