Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Apr;11(Suppl 5):S812-S818.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.62.

Jejunostomy or nasojejunal tube after esophagectomy: a review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Jejunostomy or nasojejunal tube after esophagectomy: a review of the literature

Fernando Augusto de Vasconcellos Santos et al. J Thorac Dis. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer are a difficult to treat group of patients. At diagnosis they will present some degree of malnutrition in up to 80% and the causes are from multifactorial origin: the inability of food ingestion, advanced age, taste disturbances, and morbidity related to neoadjuvant treatment. In order to restaure the nutritional status, enteral nutritional support is preferable to parenteral support because of the risks of septic complications associated with venous catheters. During the postoperative period, the oral route is often inaccessible in these patients due to swallowing disorders and eventually mechanical ventilation, and if possible, often it does not provide sufficient caloric amounts for postoperative energy balance. For these reasons, it is usually recommended additional nutritional support. There are few studies in the literature that specifically address which is the most adequate route for enteral nutrition in patients undergoing esophagectomy. Nasojejunal catheters present a higher incidence of local complications, such as displacement and occlusion, whereas jejunostomy is more associated with reinterventions for the treatment of complications secondary to extravasation. Although there is weak evidence in the literature and a lack of randomized, prospective and multicenter studies evaluating the best enteral nutrition route in the postoperative period of esophagectomy, the use of the nasoenteric catheter seems to be adequate due to its simplicity of positioning and low rates of severe complications. In this paper a review is performed of the evidence about this subject.

Keywords: Enteral nutrition; esophagectomy; jejunostomy; nasojejunal catheter; nutritional support; parenteral nutrition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Jakobson T, Karjagin J, Vipp L, et al. Postoperative complications and mortality after major gastrointestinal surgery. Medicina (Kaunas) 2014;50:111-7. 10.1016/j.medici.2014.06.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kight CE. Nutrition considerations in esophagectomy patients. Nutr Clin Pract 2008;23:521-8. 10.1177/0884533608323427 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atkins BZ, Shah AS, Hutcheson KA, et al. Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1170-6 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.034 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marin FA, Lamênica-Garcia VC, Henry MA, et al. Grade of esophageal cancer and nutritional status impact on postsurgery outcomes. Arq Gastroenterol 2010;47:348-53. 10.1590/S0004-28032010000400006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dubecz A, Kun L, Stadlhuber RJ, et al. The origins of an operation: A brief history of transhiatal esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2009;249:535-40. 10.1097/01.sla.0000345936.63500.aa - DOI - PubMed