Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;34(2):359-366.
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1611542. Epub 2019 May 13.

Faces in the wild: A naturalistic study of children's facial expressions in response to an Internet prank

Michael M Shuster  1 , Linda A Camras  1 , Adam Grabell  2 , Susan B Perlman  3
Affiliations

Faces in the wild: A naturalistic study of children's facial expressions in response to an Internet prank

Michael M Shuster et al. Cogn Emot. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

There is surprisingly little empirical evidence supporting theoretical and anecdotal claims regarding the spontaneous production of prototypic facial expressions used in numerous emotion recognition studies. Proponents of innate prototypic expressions believe that this lack of evidence may be due to ethical restrictions against presenting powerful elicitors in the lab. The current popularity of internet platforms designed for public sharing of videos allows investigators to shed light on this debate by examining naturally-occurring facial expressions outside the laboratory. An Internet prank ("Scary Maze") has provided a unique opportunity to observe children reacting to a consistent fear- and surprise-inducing stimulus: The unexpected presentation of a "scary face" during an online maze game. The purpose of this study was to examine children's facial expressions in this naturalistic setting. Emotion ratings of non-facial behaviour (provided by untrained undergraduates) and anatomically-based facial codes were obtained from 60 videos of children (ages 4-7) found on YouTube. Emotion ratings were highest for fear and surprise. Correspondingly, children displayed more facial expressions of fear and surprise than for other emotions (e.g. anger, joy). These findings provide partial support for the ecological validity of fear and surprise expressions. Still prototypic expressions were produced by fewer than half the children.

Keywords: Fear; YouTube; emotional expressions; prototypic expressions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

    1. Anderson CL, Monroy M, & Keltner D. (2017), October 26. Emotion in the wilds of nature: The coherence and contagion of fear during threatening group-based outdoors experiences. Emotion, doi:10.1037/emo0000378 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aviezer H, Trope Y, & Todorov A. (2012). Body cues, not facial expressions, discriminate between intense positive and negative emotions. Science, 338(6111), 1225–1229. - PubMed
    1. Barrett K, & Campos J. (1987). Perspectives on emotional development II: A functionalist approach to emotions In Osofsky J (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (2nd ed., pp. 555–578). New York: Wiley.
    1. Barrett LF, & Russell J (Eds.). (2015). The psychological construction of emotion. New York: Guilford Press.
    1. Bennett D, Bendersky M, & Lewis M. (2002). Facial expressivity at 4 months: A context by expression analysis. Infancy, 3, 97–113. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types