Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 13;8(5):673.
doi: 10.3390/jcm8050673.

The Different Microbial Etiology of Prosthetic Joint Infections according to Route of Acquisition and Time after Prosthesis Implantation, Including the Role of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms

Affiliations

The Different Microbial Etiology of Prosthetic Joint Infections according to Route of Acquisition and Time after Prosthesis Implantation, Including the Role of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms

Natividad Benito et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

The aim of our study was to characterize the etiology of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs)-including multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO)-by category of infection. A multicenter study of 2544 patients with PJIs was performed. We analyzed the causative microorganisms according to the Tsukayama's scheme (early postoperative, late chronic, and acute hematogenous infections (EPI, LCI, AHI) and "positive intraoperative cultures" (PIC)). Non-hematogenous PJIs were also evaluated according to time since surgery: <1 month, 2-3 months, 4-12 months, >12 months. AHIs were mostly caused by Staphylococcus aureus (39.2%) and streptococci (30.2%). EPIs were characterized by a preponderance of virulent microorganisms (S. aureus, Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), enterococci), MDROs (24%) and polymicrobial infections (27.4%). Conversely, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and Cutibacterium species were predominant in LCIs (54.5% and 6.1%, respectively) and PICs (57.1% and 15.1%). The percentage of MDROs isolated in EPIs was more than three times the percentage isolated in LCIs (7.8%) and more than twice the proportion found in AHI (10.9%). There was a significant decreasing linear trend over the four time intervals post-surgery for virulent microorganisms, MDROs, and polymicrobial infections, and a rising trend for CoNS, streptococci and Cutibacterium spp. The observed differences have important implications for the empirical antimicrobial treatment of PJIs.

Keywords: antimicrobial empirical treatment; classification schemes for prosthetic joint infections; microbial etiology; multidrug-resistant organisms; prosthetic joint infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interests relevant to this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Main microorganisms or group of microorganisms involved in prosthetic joint infections according to Tsukayama’s classification (A), and in non-hematogenous prosthetic joint infection according to time since index surgery (B).

References

    1. Schwarz E.M., Parvizi J., Gehrke T., Aiyer A., Battenberg A., Brown S.A., Callaghan J.J., Citak M., Egol K., Garrigues G.E., et al. 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection: Research Priorities from the General Assembly Questions. J. Orthop. Res. 2019;37:997–1006. doi: 10.1002/jor.24293. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peel T.N. Studying Biofilm and Clinical Issues in Orthopedics. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00359. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saeed K., McLaren A.C., Schwarz E.M., Antoci V., Arnold W.V., Chen A.F., Clauss M., Esteban J., Gant V., Hendershot E., et al. 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection: Summary from the biofilm workgroup and consensus on biofilm related musculoskeletal infections. J. Orthop. Res. 2019;37:1007–1017. doi: 10.1002/jor.24229. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zimmerli W., Sendi P. Orthopaedic biofilm infections. APMIS. 2017;125:353–364. doi: 10.1111/apm.12687. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tande A.J., Gomez-Urena E.O., Berbari E.F., Osmon D.R. Management of prosthetic joint infection. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 2017;31:237–252. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2017.01.009. - DOI - PubMed