Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;57(9):778-788.
doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0285-1. Epub 2019 May 13.

Understanding and modelling the economic impact of spinal cord injuries in the United Kingdom

Affiliations

Understanding and modelling the economic impact of spinal cord injuries in the United Kingdom

David McDaid et al. Spinal Cord. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Study design: Economic modelling analysis.

Objectives: To determine lifetime direct and indirect costs from initial hospitalisation of all expected new traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injuries (SCI) over 12 months.

Setting: United Kingdom (UK).

Methods: Incidence-based approach to assessing costs from a societal perspective, including immediate and ongoing health, rehabilitation and long-term care directly attributable to SCI, as well as aids and adaptations, unpaid informal care and participation in employment. The model accounts for differences in injury severity, gender, age at onset and life expectancy.

Results: Lifetime costs for an expected 1270 new cases of SCI per annum conservatively estimated as £1.43 billion (2016 prices). This equates to a mean £1.12 million (median £0.72 million) per SCI case, ranging from £0.47 million (median £0.40 million) for an AIS grade D injury to £1.87 million (median £1.95 million) for tetraplegia AIS A-C grade injuries. Seventy-one percent of lifetime costs potentially are paid by the public purse with remaining costs due to reduced employment and carer time.

Conclusions: Despite the magnitude of costs, and being comparable with international estimates, this first analysis of SCI costs in the UK is likely to be conservative. Findings are particularly sensitive to the level and costs of long-term home and residential care. The analysis demonstrates how modelling can be used to highlight economic impacts of SCI rapidly to policymakers, illustrate how changes in future patterns of injury influence costs and help inform future economic evaluations of actions to prevent and/or reduce the impact of SCIs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have any direct conflicts of interests, but the analysis presented has been funded through an unrestricted grant to the London School of Economics and Political Science from the International Spinal Research Trust (ISRT). MB is Director of Research at Spinal Research, the UK affiliate of the ISRT.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of model structure
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean lifetime costs of new spinal cord injuries by type and gender (2016 £ millions)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean lifetime costs per new tetraplegic traumatic spinal cord injury by age-group and gender (2016 £ millions)

References

    1. McCaughey EJ, Purcell M, McLean AN, Fraser MH, Bewick A, Borotkanics RJ, et al. Changing demographics of spinal cord injury over a 20-year pgeriod: a longitudinal population-based study in Scotland. Spinal Cord. 2016;54:270–6. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.167. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. NICE. Spinal injury: assessment and initial management. Clinical guideline. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2015. - PubMed
    1. Sezer N, Akkus S, Ugurlu FG. Chronic complications of spinal cord injury. World J Orthop. 2015;6:24–33. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.24. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Graupensperger S, Sweet SN, Evans MB. Multimorbidity of overweight and obesity alongside anxiety and depressive disorders in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2018:1–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Green W, Craig J. Identifying the economic value of the Keiro service pathway. York: York Health Economics Consortium, University of York; 2015.

MeSH terms